Irexes
Legend
Silver Level
As a tourney player like myself, I wonder if you suffer from what afflicted me in my previous attempts to play ring which is to play the small pots well, but lose the big ones which make the difference, because of the massively different way that hands play for stacks in tournies as opposed to ring.
I've had quite a few goes at ring over the years and have failed despite feeling I should be winning. This time around I'm 7k hands in and doing well at 25NL. There's a lot of differences that have finally clicked but the biggest are around hands deep in stacks. The need to protect hands is far greater as well with check-raising having a role, but a different one.
The hand above I hear what you are saying about the bad players, but it reads like a tourney hand where you are looking to trap for stacks. In ring I think this can give out reverse implied odds more easily as the stacks are much deeper. Won't read too much into one hand though as it's just one hand
Re the tourney transition though for me this has been a huge change in many areas, I'm going to write something up soon comparing and contrasting the two forms, that may or may not be of use.
I've had quite a few goes at ring over the years and have failed despite feeling I should be winning. This time around I'm 7k hands in and doing well at 25NL. There's a lot of differences that have finally clicked but the biggest are around hands deep in stacks. The need to protect hands is far greater as well with check-raising having a role, but a different one.
The hand above I hear what you are saying about the bad players, but it reads like a tourney hand where you are looking to trap for stacks. In ring I think this can give out reverse implied odds more easily as the stacks are much deeper. Won't read too much into one hand though as it's just one hand
Re the tourney transition though for me this has been a huge change in many areas, I'm going to write something up soon comparing and contrasting the two forms, that may or may not be of use.