Yesterday I was in a $1.10 $600.00 GTD MTT tournament, this exact situation came up. My opponent under the gun min-raised 2000 chips, then a flat by my another opponent who was next to act; I flatted with Kh, 3h in cut off and everyone else folded and BB checked. I put my first opponent UTG with AA the other opponent I was not for sure.
Flop came Kd, 3c, Js, UTG bet pot 8000 chips, the next opponent re-raised all in, this, since I did not put the second opponent on a hand I was wondering about a bigger two pair; I went all in BB flolded and UTG called.
UTG showed As, AD, my other opponent showed Qc, 10s; turn was 5h and the river was a 7c. I was the chip leader with over 100K and finished 7th for $25.00 and it was this hand helped finish deep in this tournament. I entered the hand cheap and tripled up and once I had two pair on the flop where was I going then?
When I understand what my opponents hole cards are by their bets and know what starting hand I need to beat them and then hit my flop, I just have an understanding on how to beat them no more no less.
If my opponent raises three big blinds I am not even that hand or any others with K3 suited with that open raise of three big blinds. Since I have observed many of my opponents min-raise with AA, KK, etc... very often and I have many cheap chances to take down big pots against opponents that will not lay those big hands down and willingly hand me their chips.
I just have a humanistic approach, it is just how I see the game; just as the hard work you have put into your game to become successful. I play limit poker, this is the purist form of poker that I have found and it translates well to no-limit also.
More amusing is him reading me for AA/KK etc with a min raise......This is the kind of strategy that makes min raising hands like AA KK QQ AK profitable. So thank you :wink:
Yesterday I was in a $1.10 $600.00 GTD MTT tournament, this exact situation came up. My opponent under the gun min-raised 2000 chips, then a flat by my another opponent who was next to act; I flatted with Kh, 3h in cut off and everyone else folded and BB checked. I put my first opponent UTG with AA the other opponent I was not for sure.
Flop came Kd, 3c, Js, UTG bet pot 8000 chips, the next opponent re-raised all in, this, since I did not put the second opponent on a hand I was wondering about a bigger two pair; I went all in BB flolded and UTG called.
UTG showed As, AD, my other opponent showed Qc, 10s; turn was 5h and the river was a 7c. I was the chip leader with over 100K and finished 7th for $25.00 and it was this hand helped finish deep in this tournament. I entered the hand cheap and tripled up and once I had two pair on the flop where was I going then?
More amusing is him reading me for AA/KK etc with a min raise......
Have you not heard of tricky barst**ds like me who 3x EVERYTHING so you can't read us?
Saying that, not sure its even tricky, but standard now........
I love nothing more than a player who varies their bet size depending on their hand strength.
A thought for the day :
What really is meant by limping a big pocket pair ?
I wouldn't suggest this aside from very very few situations but I think what is meant is anticipating a raise from a later position and/or disguising your hand.
Was this actually meant at a certain part of the game ?
No, just in general.
Was it meant in a certain situation ?
Originally, yes. But not itt.
Could this statement been miss understood a bit ?
I'm misunderstanding your question.
Like a fish story by the time the word gets out to the rest of the city you went from catching a 10 pound fish to catching a 30 pound fish .
The only way we will ever know is to ask the person that first made that statement .
I generally 2 or 3x everything as I play hyper turbo SNG's. I tend to switch them around randomly, with an occasional flat call just to keep it even more confusing.This is good. Even better when you're 2.2x-2.5x everything. 3xing everything can get expensive and commit you pretty easily. Just my opinion, and yea you got it right by opening the same consistently.
I believe I was the only one in the hand at the time all the money was in that had the best hand and I knew this why would I fold the best hand; my opponents had to hit to beat me. The way the hand played out after the flop was the way it was supposed to happen. The understanding of my opponents lets me have great timing, also it lets me know when I am beat.
However, everyone has their own approach and play any two cards the way they see best. I work very hard on my approach to poker, just like anyone else playing the game. I just have a simple approach that goes against the grain to others playing styles. I do however, respect your comment on your thinking of my play.
this thread has gone backwards
Replying here to you ovitoo
"Could this statement been miss understood a bit ?
I'm misunderstanding your question. "
what I meant was the very first person to have made that statement if it was years ago what that person meant .
I have found that as years go by some statements are a bit misunderstood and the true reason or meaning may be altered a bit . not because some one did this purposely but things get just misunderstood .
gus201
This thread officially became spam.