I had the very strong feeling from the beginning , that this would be a garbage article to read , a total waste of time , but since OP mentioned it at the threads' opening post and asked for the opinion on this particular article , I felt obligated to read it if I wanted to post and contribute in this thread, in order to judge it right and make a truethfull comment .
I started reading it . Until the point where it says that many (most??) women in poker are bought , not just brought , on tournaments by their '' sugar daddies '' . Do I really have to read all the rest 3/4 of this garbage link ?? Better if you had asked generally what we think of people saying that women don't like playing poker , or of people saying that they are not good at poker , or those supporting they shouldn't play poker at all , it would be less time consuming . Very easily the answers would follow as simple as '' not true '' , or '' sexist bias dogmatic opinions and predispositions '' (many men saying these , maybe the only good thing they recognise women are good at is sex , also cooking in the best scenario , probably they don't have enough sex in their life , maybe no sex at all , but they feel capable and righteous to express such opinions ....) , or that '' it's not scientifically proven '' or similar answers would MOSTLY follow up .
Spend one more minute to read this nonsense .. I don't want to read it even if this was the last article, thread , book page or whatever in the world ..... Simply just cr*p ..