Speaking shame and admitting - I got "Theory" about 6 months after I started playing - WHOOOOOSH!
Played 6 more months (and read all of Gordons stuff and some others) and them all of sudden "Theory" made perfect sense. It had as much to do with having a lot more hands under the belt as anything.
I agree. I started reading Theory of Poker less than a year ago and it just was too dry of a read for me and it required too much concentration to follow it. So after the first few chapters I set it down and continued playing and re-reading some other books.
I have put in at least another 200K hands and have decided to stop playing for a break. While on my break I picked up Theory of poker again and it was not quite as difficult to follow. I think some of his discussions and examples follow a line that unless you have played some hands it is difficult to follow.
So far the read is good this time (only about half way through). A lot of the concepts in this book are great and were forward thinking when this book came out. For today I think it can give you an idea of what modern poker is built on but I am not expecting anything revolutionary from it. Just help get a clearer picture of concepts and why you should do thing things you should do.
^^^^ Yep, same here. I have read it twice so far. It was my second poker book, and first reading I was totally in the dark most of the time. But he does make a number of statements about the reader perhaps being one of the better players at the table in the situations describes, so it seems more directed towards players who have a good foundation already.
If you play a lot of MTT's I highly suggest " Poker Tournament Formula " by Arnold Snyder.
It improved my tourney game.
I have read it (both volumes actually) and I have very mixed feelings. There are a lot of interesting concepts, and he does advocate attacking weakness, which is good, but I think someone could get in a lot of trouble with some of his "strategies". But its all a cafeteria anyway, meaning take what you want and leave the rest. If it helps you, then that is good. But I think someone who doesent understand the reason he approaches tourney like he does (as opposed to a more conventional style) can donk a lot of chips away following his advice. But I did like a lot of his thinking, like "rock, scissors, paper" and so on. When combined with other styles, it is a good weapon to have in you arsenal.