its a fact, luck can depend on your instincts,
some people have strong senses and that plays a part of their game, especially in tournaments its not just skill, some of these players run like jesus 90% of the time and are always up their.
ivey neagranu, hellmuth, mercier
to name a few
Google's definitions:
Statistics is the practice or science of collecting and analyzing numerical data in large quantities, esp. for the purpose of inferring proportions in a whole from those in a representative sample.
Inferring is to deduce or conclude (information) from evidence and reasoning rather than from explicit statements.
An instinct is an innate, typically fixed pattern of behavior in animals in response to certain stimuli.
-
These "instincts" you're talking about aren't instincts. They aren't natural. The professionals you mentioned - they didn't start off knowing what would likely happen. They do sense the future yes, but not through instinct. They predict the future using statistics to determine what will most likely happen. This is an ability gained through years of practice. No where near magical instincts.
Do you really believe that Ivey started off being able to predict what the next few cards would likely yield and how to bet proportionally in regard to the likelihood of what the next few cards would be?
He didn't! He started off like how everyone else did - losing. See here:
Source:
http://www.americanhistoryusa.com/the-life-of-young-phil-ivey/
He did not start off with an uncanny ability to predict the future. He started off losing! He studied his numbers and eventually got to where he is now.
He worked his arse off to get his "luck." I hate the term because of how controversial it is. Skill and luck are near synonymous. More skill means more good runs. More good runs indicate someone who is lucky. More skill means more luck.