...aboveHmm really? I had no idea that mattered whatsover. Tell you what, next time you're 100BB deep heads-up at the final table of any 45 man SNG, send me a screenshot, will you?
...I don't play 45 man SNGs, so that's not going to happen any time soon.
I just assumed that most people would have the sense to deduce the point you made below, but I guess I was wrong. My bad, won't repeat it in the future.
...I don't like to assume anything. Yes, I had the common sense to deduce the stacks may have been shallow, but I don't assume they were because I don't know how that SNG played out. What if every player had gone all-in, at every table, and all but 5 busted out on the first hand? Now we're at a 5-man final table, deep stacked, and low blinds. Is this very unlikely and pretty stupid to consider? Yes, but it's possible and I wouldn't have know this unless you had mentioned it. The more information you give, the clearer a reply can be.
In which scenario do you think I'm less likely to mention how deep we were?:
(1) We weren't deep enough for it to matter
...Stack sizes always matter. I don't know why you think it doesn't. More importantly, effect stack size is important on how one should consider playing a hand.
What about other stack sizes at the table? This is also important as well. What if next BB only has 1 chip left and you're shoving AK for 15BBs in what's most likely a flip scenario against an equal stack. I haven't checked ICM, but that's possibly a fold in that situation, but possibly a shove if all stacks were equal.
(2) This is the extremely rare scenario where we got down to headsup action so fast that we are still in one of the early blind levels...Well, I would hope you mention the blinds in this scenario. It would save a lot of time, especially for those of us who don't like to assume anything.
Stack sizes always matter. I don't know why you think it doesn't.
More importantly, effect stack size is important on how one should consider playing a hand.
What about other stack sizes at the table? This is also important as well. What if next BB only has 1 chip left and you're shoving AK for 15BBs in what's most likely a flip scenario against an equal stack. I haven't checked ICM, but that's possibly a fold in that situation, but possibly a shove if all stacks were equal.
I think there were a couple of things. You had the read on him so his re-raise should have signaled a big hand. I think you could have smooth called in this situation. It's a good play because if he is re-raising you and he's a super nit, then he is wanting you to push and try to bully so he can call you, in fact, he was waiting for that hand to do it with. A call here and then you could test him on the flop, if overs come, he may believe you and you've picked up the pot, same with a lot of other scare boards, if you completely miss and he is still playing aggressive, then you have gotten away from the hand relatively cheap, and the way he is playing, unless he is getting a lot of big hands, you are going to chip away at him until he has no choice but to start playing back at you, But in this situation, where the chips are even and your up against a super nit, I think the right move is to call pre-flop and then outplay him.
Heads-up at the final table of a 45 man SNG on Pokerstars. The other guy is a super nit. His VPIP at the beginning of the FT(41 hands) was 2. He managed to win a lot of flips and had around 35k chips and I had around 30k. I was re-raising pretty much everything and he was folding. 6-7 hands in, when our stacks were about equal, I got AK and I bet, he raised and I re-raised him all in. He had 1010 and it held up. There is no way I should've folded in that spot right?