Those things are as different as it gets. In first case player digs into a game deeper and deeper to understand its core and when and where to make the correct move. Player understands what hes doing. In the second case its like monkey see monkey do. WIthout those stats that player would be a completely different player.
So let me get this straight. Playing single table is not efficient, so you open more and more tables. You open so many tables that playing as many tables becomes inefficient. And then you .. You try to use HUD to cover that inefficiency? That does not look like a very efficient way to you know play poker. Also as for me i really play much more efficiently if i give at least some attention to a table to feel its dynamics.
Sir i have never deposited in poker but i made living from it for 2 years of my life. 2 days ago i had zero, i won few bucks from freerolls and now i already have 190 bucks. I have absolutely zero anger over anything i did not achieve in poker. Quite franckly i think players that use hud are kind of sad. That they cannot do this stuff themselves. That they cannot see who plays what game. I am not personally concerned with that problem with HUD, i am concerned for a game itself, and how it makes game more stupid and bad and less fun. I am a big man. I am so big of a man that i am changing the world around me for beter. Or at least trying to.
First of all nobody have any edge on me sir. The fact that someone needs some HUD vs me just make me wana hug that player okay. Before taking his mony.
Again, my problem is on a much higher level.
It was not my comment.
I take it as a personal insult cause im so big of a man that i personally care for everything around me and try to change everything for beter.
You have taken it very personally that people use, and like, this allowed software. You have taken it so personally that, in your post above, there are some somewhat hidden and some very obvious insulting comments towards me and others. I do not understand this. I would have enjoyed explaining why I think what I think, but to be then talked to like I am less than you makes me no longer interested in investing time in this discussion. It also says a lot about who you are, but that is not my problem. But, when your words are there, well, I can't really help but see them.
Your first paragraph shows me that you have one way of seeing things, and when I try to present an alternate way of seeing this, you refuse to even think of trying to see things from my point of view. (You do not have to agree with someone to try to see it their way to better understand their thoughts) It also shows me that you have zero understanding of what is involved in using the information you get from the software. I mean, really zero understanding of how it is used. I would explain in more detail, but.....
But it is your attitude more than anything that convinces me that an open-minded discussion just ain't gonna happen with you. You are, in your mind, simply right and that is the end of the story. I encounter this much too often (usually not in the poker software world, but hey...) and if someone shows they believe to already know it all, that's fine with me. I personally prefer a path of humility and curiosity, among others, but each must walk the path of their own choosing.
OK. That's your path, and that's fine. Enjoy your life and stay healthy.
I would, however, like to know how you made your living from Poker for 2 years. If you would be so kind, what stakes were you playing, was it live or online, and how many hours a month were you actively playing, and how many hours a month were you actively reviewing your play in any form at all, and how did you perform this review? All questions a pro can answer fairly easily. Thank you.