Cardschat Lock Poker Withdrawal Assistance Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
D

detourglr

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Nov 25, 2012
Total posts
229
Chips
0
About lock poker, in a way doesnt surprise me. I remember when they left Merge gaming how people was saying they would never deposit on that site becuase of the history of the people running it. At the time I questioned it becuase I thought maybe it was people upset by their move... but looking like they was right now..
 
italian314

italian314

Enthusiast
Silver Level
Joined
Jul 22, 2012
Total posts
27
Chips
0
I was going to make a deposit to Lock Poker but now you have talked me out of it..... Does anyone no any sites that will let me deposit with mastercard im in the US....
 
TeUnit

TeUnit

Legend
Loyaler
Joined
Jan 20, 2009
Total posts
4,804
Awards
14
Chips
116
6wks lol, 6 months if u did no player to players
 
hackmeplz

hackmeplz

Sleep Faster
Silver Level
Joined
May 1, 2012
Total posts
2,282
Awards
1
Chips
2
Whether I wait 2 weeks or 6 weeks, it doesn't matter as long as they send it.

Super lol at thinking 6 weeks is the long timeframe. I'd bet pretty much any amount of money that if you are American and try to cash out from Lock now that you won't have received it in 6 weeks.
 
S

smidjet

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Mar 22, 2013
Total posts
285
Chips
0
i also have tried to get CC to comment on the state of lock and their support of them dispite all the complaints and have not heard from them, i can only guess that they are getting a good kick back and need to stay quiet to get paid. so i have not deposited there yet even though i really want a second site to play ring. my main site is bovada and dont trust their anonymous system to play ring and stick to mtt . thought lock might be worth a try but so many complaints about them and CC refusing to answer any of these threads has kept me from depositing there.
 
moots

moots

Min-cash specialist
Loyaler
Joined
Jul 29, 2008
Total posts
9,393
Awards
8
CA
Chips
114
i also have tried to get CC to comment on the state of lock and their support of them dispite all the complaints and have not heard from them, i can only guess that they are getting a good kick back and need to stay quiet to get paid. so i have not deposited there yet even though i really want a second site to play ring. my main site is bovada and dont trust their anonymous system to play ring and stick to mtt . thought lock might be worth a try but so many complaints about them and CC refusing to answer any of these threads has kept me from depositing there.

So by insinuating CardsChat is corrupt and being dishonest to it's members with regards to Lock, I assume you won't be playing in any of the freerolls?
 
T

themosthigh

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Dec 22, 2012
Total posts
343
Chips
0
The one good thing I can say is that the other day cardschat did drop the deposit requirement to play in the freeroll but still the freeroll isn't the problem.
 
quintass

quintass

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Nov 14, 2005
Total posts
339
Chips
0
Quote:
<TABLE border=0 cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=6 width="100%"><TBODY><TR><TD class=alt2>Originally Posted by smidjet
i also have tried to get CC to comment on the state of lock and their support of them dispite all the complaints and have not heard from them, i can only guess that they are getting a good kick back and need to stay quiet to get paid. so i have not deposited there yet even though i really want a second site to play ring. my main site is bovada and dont trust their anonymous system to play ring and stick to mtt . thought lock might be worth a try but so many complaints about them and CC refusing to answer any of these threads has kept me from depositing there.
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>

Only from Oregon! :eek:
 
xdeucesx

xdeucesx

Bar Master
Silver Level
Joined
Aug 7, 2010
Total posts
7,139
Awards
3
Chips
21
I deposited $30 bucks for a chance to play in the CC $500 freerolls and have played in just about every one of them. To date I have quadrupled my $30. I do not do P2P so that fact doesn't really bother me. Whether I wait 2 weeks or 6 weeks, it doesn't matter as long as they send it. That $30 was a very good investment for me. I like the software and enjoy playing there. Now, if I should have a problem in the future cashing out, then my opinion may change. But but as of right now I enjoy playing at Lock and will continue to do so. Thanks CC for the games!

gl bc you'll never see that 30$ again. Zero chance of cashing out under 4 months and at the rate Lock is going, you'll probably never get to cash out tbh.
 
Poof

Poof

Made in the USA
Silver Level
Joined
May 21, 2008
Total posts
14,419
Chips
0
I have withdrawn twice the past year and it was a 2 month wait each time (one was WU) which didn't bother me, as long as I got the money I am fine with that. What bothers me though is if you ever received a transfer you cannot withdraw. I know I have sent money but tbh not sure if I ever received one, I am going to have to check that out because that would be a deal breaker for me.
 
quintass

quintass

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Nov 14, 2005
Total posts
339
Chips
0
Wouldn't withdraw a balance under $100-$125 anyway. More fun to just keep playing with it.
 
M

Mursilis1

Enthusiast
Silver Level
Joined
Apr 30, 2013
Total posts
78
Chips
0
I tried lock poker the other day and the software was terrible. Carbon has good software. Thankyou for all the information about this site!
 
T-Dubs82

T-Dubs82

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Mar 26, 2007
Total posts
1,289
Awards
1
Chips
0
Not complaining about them offering a freeroll. The op was more about their affiliate page up top. If you were a new US player and came across cardschat and clicked on their "US Poker Sites" tab up top you would see their number 2 recommendation is Lock Poker. They sure make it sound like a great place to play. Most people wont spend an hour on the web researching a site if a large community such as cardschat is recommending it as the 2nd best site for US players to play on. Look at that sweet logo on the page! "Top rated! Legal, Safe, Secure, High Quality Rooms Only!" Then they list Lock in 2nd place with an 8.58 rating and a supposed cash out speed of 15 days...........15 days!!!!!!!!!!! Click on that link and they basically get a 5 star rating from cardchat. Laughable.

if you blindly deposit $ on anything without doing the most basic research, you deserve to get burned
 
T-Dubs82

T-Dubs82

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Mar 26, 2007
Total posts
1,289
Awards
1
Chips
0
if cardschat is offering freerolls on Lock, who are we to complain about it. do your due diligence when any site regardless of who/what promotes it. if you feel its not worth playing there or anywhere, then dont. Thanks for the Cardschat for such a great forum and for the freerrolls

its pretty simple
 
curtinsea

curtinsea

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Aug 28, 2010
Total posts
495
Awards
1
Chips
2
I have withdrawn twice the past year and it was a 2 month wait each time (one was WU) which didn't bother me, as long as I got the money I am fine with that. What bothers me though is if you ever received a transfer you cannot withdraw. I know I have sent money but tbh not sure if I ever received one, I am going to have to check that out because that would be a deal breaker for me.

I don't think that is actually the case, although all the talk from the 'poker community' seems to believe that is true, and they have some reason to. Communication has been poor on Lock's end.

They were dealing with some accounts that were buying up Lock funds at a discount and then trying to withdraw without playing. This is the issue Lock is trying to stop. There was at least one affiliate who created monkey accounts under his own banner strictly for the purpose of transferring funds to and withdrawing, with no actual play on the accounts. This is textbook money laundering folks, and it is a real issue even if players want to ignore it.

Right now there is a such a huge fuss going on, any time a Lock rep says anything they are pounced on and shredded on the forum. In a way I don't blame the reps for keeping mum until the issue can be sorted out.

Over the weekend, more than a dozen threads with thousands of comments of abuse showed up over there . . . just over the weekend. Give it a couple of days and see if they can get a clear message out. The mob mentality and shout-fest accomplishes nothing.
 
curtinsea

curtinsea

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Aug 28, 2010
Total posts
495
Awards
1
Chips
2
Also, the 6-month withdrawal time is an example of how the 'tale grows taller on down the line.' 3-months is the outside for receiving a check for US players according to most reports, and I personally know players are getting WU withdrawals in about 6 weeks.
 
curtinsea

curtinsea

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Aug 28, 2010
Total posts
495
Awards
1
Chips
2
I say this all the time, and it is still true today. Your money is not safe on any poker site, especially if you are in the US. You can wake up tomorrow and that site can be gone along with your money. That is reality, and it doesn't matter what site you're talking about. So it's a real 'buyer beware' situation. Don't risk what you can't afford to lose.

And as was suggested above, anyone calling for removal of affiliate banners should be barred from participating in the benefits those affiliate banners provide (freerolls and such).
 
kidkvno1

kidkvno1

Sarah's Pet
Bronze Level
Joined
Aug 20, 2008
Total posts
16,281
Awards
4
Chips
50
The OP of that thread is the guy who started/runs http://pokerfraudalert.com
Even he should understand why Lock is cracking down on P2P transfers.


My take on why Lock is cracking down on P2P transfers.
Withdraw via lock, and they take a small fee to do the withdraw, so they get cash to keep the site up, P2P transfers and they get small fee for withdrawing.
20 withdraws at a fee of say $20.00 20 x $20.00 = $400.00
20 P2P transfers and one withdraw = $20.00 1 x $20.00 = $20.00
Which way is making Lock more money, Money they need to stay afloat!!
 
xdeucesx

xdeucesx

Bar Master
Silver Level
Joined
Aug 7, 2010
Total posts
7,139
Awards
3
Chips
21
Wouldn't withdraw a balance under $100-$125 anyway. More fun to just keep playing with it.

Yeah obv, but if you ever run that balance up to something you want to w/d, you won't be able too.


Lets be honest, Lock only has 4-6 months of operating left most likely. There not giving out w/d's, there stiffing affiliates and killing action at every level with fair play technology. if you haven't w/d yet, do it now or try to sell it off on the marketplace.
 
moots

moots

Min-cash specialist
Loyaler
Joined
Jul 29, 2008
Total posts
9,393
Awards
8
CA
Chips
114
My take on why Lock is cracking down on P2P transfers.
Withdraw via lock, and they take a small fee to do the withdraw, so they get cash to keep the site up, P2P transfers and they get small fee for withdrawing.
20 withdraws at a fee of say $20.00 20 x $20.00 = $400.00
20 P2P transfers and one withdraw = $20.00 1 x $20.00 = $20.00
Which way is making Lock more money, Money they need to stay afloat!!

Or the most obvious reason: sites need new money (deposits) coming in to operate. P2P transfers make it possible to for users to play without depositing.
 
hackmeplz

hackmeplz

Sleep Faster
Silver Level
Joined
May 1, 2012
Total posts
2,282
Awards
1
Chips
2
Even he should understand why Lock is cracking down on P2P transfers.


My take on why Lock is cracking down on P2P transfers.
Withdraw via lock, and they take a small fee to do the withdraw, so they get cash to keep the site up, P2P transfers and they get small fee for withdrawing.
20 withdraws at a fee of say $20.00 20 x $20.00 = $400.00
20 P2P transfers and one withdraw = $20.00 1 x $20.00 = $20.00
Which way is making Lock more money, Money they need to stay afloat!!

No actually they refund one fee/month and it costs them FAR more than the fee they charge to process an American withdrawal. For most people who transfer, it is an alternative to withdrawing. If they are legit, they have all the money from player balances in a safe place somewhere. So if 20 people want to each withdraw $20, they would have to pay to process 20 different payments of $20 each. If those 20 people just transfer to one person and he then withdraws $400, they're paying the same amount out and it probably costs less to process. Processing deposits costs money too so let's say the person actually wouldn't withdraw it. Eliminating p2p creates a situation of 20 people withdrawing $20 each and someone depositing $400. Net cash flow is 0 but they have to pay the fees to move money. If they just allow p2p now they have to pay $0 in fees and the net cash flow is exactly the same and everyone is just as happy.

The real reason any site at least claims to have a play-through requirement is to prevent money laundering. Money laundering does not hurt the site in the slightest but is usually required by regulatory agencies because governments tend to not like poker sites being places for terrorists to launder money. But let's be real if anyone is laundering money on Lock Poker right now they're just downright retarded.

Literally the only logical reason for a site to not want p2p transfers to cash out is if they don't have the money on hand. They only have to pay out 2k every 6 months or so, and lately they've been waiting 3-4 months only to deny NON-US cashouts. As long as they keep deposits incoming they can just rob peter to pay paul. But now that it's getting out on 2p2 and some poker media Lock is going to see traffic and deposits plummet, and unless they actually are solvent and just really really retarded, they're going to crash and burn in the somewhat near future. fwiw stinger aka Brian Hastings has offered to bet his 100k to someone else's 50k that Lock is insolvent. That equates to him thinking there is a 66%+ chance that they are insolvent and he's willing to put money on the line for it.
 
quintass

quintass

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Nov 14, 2005
Total posts
339
Chips
0
Yeah obv, but if you ever run that balance up to something you want to w/d, you won't be able too.


Lets be honest, Lock only has 4-6 months of operating left most likely. There not giving out w/d's, there stiffing affiliates and killing action at every level with fair play technology. if you haven't w/d yet, do it now or try to sell it off on the marketplace.
Wow, thats a pretty precise time frame for predicting a cardrooms demise. How'd you come up with 4-6 months?
 
T

themosthigh

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Dec 22, 2012
Total posts
343
Chips
0
Wouldn't withdraw a balance under $100-$125 anyway. More fun to just keep playing with it.

Don't even think you'd be able to withdraw if you wanted to as they have a minimum amount you're allowed to withdraw. $500 I believe, correct me if I'm wrong.
 
xdeucesx

xdeucesx

Bar Master
Silver Level
Joined
Aug 7, 2010
Total posts
7,139
Awards
3
Chips
21
Wow, thats a pretty precise time frame for predicting a cardrooms demise. How'd you come up with 4-6 months?

lol have you been paying attention at all?

Clearly not if you actually think Lock is going to hold on for much longer. CC is really bad for news on this stuff ( just not their forte), but Lock is sinking super fast lately. From trips to portugal for pro's, not allowing withdraws for weeks, no p2p xfers, the girah scandal, etc. etc.

The list goes on. Lock funds are selling at .3 on the $ right now on the 2+2 Marketplace, so that should give you an indication of the market's faith in Lock currently
 
T

themosthigh

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Dec 22, 2012
Total posts
343
Chips
0
Just read of a person on 2+2 who requested a cash out in December and he still hasn't received anything going on 20 weeks. Lock support keeps telling him "any day now" lol. If you look at pokerscout Lock has basically lost half its cash game traffic since March.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top