Made initial deposit. Slowly built bank-roll over 2 day period. Normal ups and downs with a few bad beats, really bad beats but that's expected. Experienced typical "bad variance" as well, played a ton of hands. On the third day something was different. A few players that were fish on days 1 and 2 turned into savage wolves jamming and re-raising me every-time. Was still getting aa and kk in typical fashion, but now the whole table is auto-folding no matter what raise size i do, i varied it to feel things out because it was so blatantly odd i suspected something was up almost immediately. Every marginal hand i fold, a boat appears for my would-be hand. Every hand i dont get jammed out on, a 3 flush flops of a suit i don't have. AA and kk are like a golden unicorn at this point. The rare instance i have a chance to jam my top pair top kicker, i get sucked out on by a player who frequently jams with rags, normally, i would say "great, i've experienced players jamming with rags in live action, they get lucky once, then you end up with 3 re-buys worth of their money by the end of the night." Not on Betonline, they never bust out, and this is the most bizarre aspect of the play here, post "initial run of steady success," these players steadily grow their stack until they disappear, usually after a particularly suspicious hand. If it's a sit and go, they win, maybe losing one hand the whole session, looking like the Doyle Brunson of $1.50 double or nothing. I salute people making the effort to record play and post hand histories to support this phenomenon, but for me it just doesn't do it justice, some will rightfully argue the hands as bad beats, because they are, but any experienced live action player who puts in some time on BOL will just "see it," this experience does not exist in the wild. Anyone who tries to tell me that what i experienced is normal, you are pissing on my leg and telling me it's raining. Them: "how do you know it's not rain? Did you run a chemical test on it? Me: "Well, i saw you whip it out, now my leg is warm/wet, i don't think i need a chemical test, i'm just going to pimp slap you and avoid future encounters with you."
Conclusion-
I'm a US based forensic accountant (i'm also a very experienced NLH player). I can't encounter a situation like this w/out trying to figure out what the hell is going on. I frequently hear people complaining about bots on BOL. This would be entity-level fraud, not that the site itself wouldn't de-fraud an american player who has no recourse, but i don't think they would go about it in this way, nor did it feel like this is specifically what was happening. To me, it felt like i was playing against a few players, actual human players, who could see my cards. It also felt like these human players knew what was coming most of the time, it also appeared that the few obviously legitimate american players, real humans like myself who deposited money on the site to play poker, were being targeted in a similar fashion, and their stack(s) would mirror mine in an eerie way. The stack slowly goes down, every playable hand gets jammed on by the player to your left, and as the "real" player waits for that opportunity to bust the fish w/ a set or AA, etc, the player to the left speed folds. The "fish" are the ones who consistently bust you, never busting out themselves. I suspect that the value of an american dollar is high enough in the locales where the site operates, and with corruption/oversight not being a fraction of what it is in US, that the incentive and opportunity are both there for site employees, as well as friends/family members of site employees, to access admin tools while playing and "unmask" player hands and common cards. There is an anecdote posted on another forum by a player who claims to have experienced "normal play" after complaining directly to the site regarding this type of activity. This makes sense to me, as those participating in the fraud are likely close to whoever would be receiving that type of complaint, and while tacitly accepted, the behavior is at least encouraged to cease w/ respect to the player who is trying to draw attention to it, the site would not change its algorithm or re-program its bots to lay off a player though, i don't believe, so i would go all-in on lax controls over the admin tools vs. site-wide programming fraud as the culprit.