S
sponsor
Rock Star
Silver Level
one name:SHELDON ADELSON. read on it.hope you get mad as I did.
someone benefits from banning online poker in the US ..guess who???
one name:SHELDON ADELSON. read on it.hope you get mad as I did.
With America people mean USA. Whole continents usually don't make laws together, so in Canada is different and every South American country will be different too. I believe that in Brazil for instance there is no real laws about online poker, so you could basically play in all rooms there.
someone benefits from banning online poker in the US ..guess who???
Thanks for your comment . I t was very informative and interesting. Keep playing.We're lucky in the UK to have well regulated and freely available online gambling - it isn't recognised as a game of skill either making winnings tax-free
There are social issues that remain unaddressed though, as sports and casino betting outstrips poker rooms many times over. But these issues are nothing near those presented by alcohol sales (and no politician will dare go near that one, too many British booze addicts at all social levels)
Now that USA has a regulated and available weed supply, it's actually making itself attractive to lots of people Of course the guns still put lots of people off...
If it were legalized casinos would take a hit. Casinos can afford lobbyist. Lobbyist own who?
I am one of those who think that Casino's would NOT take a hit from an active OLP. Instead I think they would benefit from a more active, and larger poker community.
An idea I have liked since I first saw it is that withdrawals and deposits could be made at any B&M cardroom. This notion shows up in some legislative proposals, but is usually removed in revisions. That's a shame cuz it would benefit both ends of the poker spectrum. From the B&M pov they should love the idea of poker players walking into their casino's and at some point having a was of cash at their disposal. Either before they deposit, or after they withdraw.
Then there could be the local connection with satelites to live events. Another win for the Live Card Rooms.
Here in California, where we have a generally healthly live poker environment, most people live within a 40 mile drive of a casino or card room.
I am one of those who think that Casino's would NOT take a hit from an active OLP. Instead I think they would benefit from a more active, and larger poker community.
An idea I have liked since I first saw it is that withdrawals and deposits could be made at any B&M cardroom. This notion shows up in some legislative proposals, but is usually removed in revisions. That's a shame cuz it would benefit both ends of the poker spectrum. From the B&M pov they should love the idea of poker players walking into their casino's and at some point having a was of cash at their disposal. Either before they deposit, or after they withdraw.
Then there could be the local connection with satelites to live events. Another win for the Live Card Rooms.
Here in California, where we have a generally healthly live poker environment, most people live within a 40 mile drive of a casino or card room.
The above plan seems to make sense both from a oversight and casino perspective. Have you heard of any consideration by casinos for this plan?
Why would you play real $$ if you couldn't recover your winnings?
https://www.cardschat.com/news/new-york-dfs-bill-passes-governor-andrew-cuomo-signs-law-28919
They think DFS is more skill than luck? Yet the guys who win these things have to enter dozens or even hundreds of lineups each tournament. Imagine if you had to bust Dan Coleman 50 times each time you entered a tournament.