My humble opinion is that everything that is shown on TV is Advertising.
...Of course it is. How do you think there was such a huge poker boom? Because of television. It was a huge advertisement that attracted a lot of new players to the game. Especially when a 'nobody' named Chris Moneymaker won it all and everyone started thinking "I can do that!"
The topicstarter placed a video with "live poker" show on TV. Couple of companies paid couple of millions for ADs during the show, TV company has earned money from subscribers... Why not pay 100K to each player to shoot them during their game? or invest 500-600K in the prize pool so they can enjoy a " nice freeroll" Can you see this? Or you do believe that there are cameras for fun, there are no operators, make up specs, film director and NO SCENARIO huh?
...The game is recorded live. Whether it was shown live or not is a completely different story. As mentioned, live poker is ridiculously boring and needs a lot of heavy editing to show a lot of the action hands as the action hands are what attract players to the game. Do you think people want to see players folding a good 80% of their hands dealt?
I know some players are sponsored and you can see their sponsorship on badges and apparel the players wear. So, yes, they're probably raking in tons of money for advertising [company]. Whether the companies decide to invest money into the prize pool is up to them, but that doesn't alter the way game is played or the outcome. Tons of pros have their tournaments paid through sponsorships, sites they represent, etc because the companies and sponsership's are banking on that they'll attract more people if [poker player] is seen playing for them. The [poker player] still has to do all of the work of playing and winning.
Yes, there are cameras, there are directors in the control room controlling which cameras get put on screen, and a tons of other things in the background that we don't see that makes the viewing experience run smoothly. However, this isn't like a sitcom TV show or movie where they actors (players) have to follow a director's direction because nothing is scripted.
If anything, I would say the only think some of the players might get asked to do is to is some crazy antics like Hellmuth's blowups because those videos attract a lot of attention. But it's never anything like "OK, Phil. We're going to rig it so you're going to get AA and [player] is going to get 108s and hit a runner-runner straight flush and I want you to explode!"
That's just silly and no pro will ever agree to that. Most they'll suggest is "Hey, Phil, if you ever blow up in this game, can you just make it really animated for us?"
Do you know why i'm not going to play at WSOP main event? because there are cameras in the table. are you 100% sure that players around you have no hidden headphone in their ears? They are so small nova days and for the past 10-15 years too...
...There are only cameras on the feature table, so you probably have nothing to worry about. On all other tables, it's filmed with hand held cameras. If you're talking about the card cams, those are there is something for viewers to see. You don't attract viewers by nothing showing them the whole cards and expect them to follow along, not knowing what is happening, especially if they're new or don't fully understand the game.
Hidden headphones? I think you mean ear pieces, but do you realize how stupid that sounds. The legal issues alone would cause so much backlash that casinos and sponsoring companies wouldn't want if anyone ever found out. It would cause them way too many problems they wouldn't want to deal with and they have nothing to gain with it.
In RL poker only a complete id..t will fold aces pre flop or the one who knows what cards will be dealt after the flop and what cards other players have.
...Well, as mentioned in this thread there is a very specific situation where you could fold aces and I agree with it, so I guess that I'm a complete idiot in that situation.
Well, unless someone is fully cheating, no one knows the outcome of the hand and will very unlikely ever fold AA preflop. Unless it's that specific situation that makes me a complete idiot or if they're just really weak, result orient players.
My arguments are:
1) Aces = made hand.
...Strongest hand preflop, but not a made hand.
2) Best pre flop hand.
...I agree.
3) Yes, the game is based on luck, and luck is proven on the river, but we're talking about pre flop AA here, right?
...Luck is proven on the river? I have to disagree this as 'luck' can happen at any point in the hand. If it's AA vs 1010, it doesn't matter where the 10 hits, whether it's on the flop, turn, or river, a set of 10s > AA. The only reason why the river is so devastating for players is because they know they have no more chances to improve. At least if it hits on the flop, they can have some hope for the turn and river.
4) You're playing for the win? So check 1 + 2 an re-raise any.
...Standard.
5) 9 People go all in before you, you're having AA - you also go all in, because of 1,2,3.
...Well, it depends on the situation. If it's an MTT and I'm sitting on the shortest stack say ~2 BBs (don't ask how I got here, just use it as example), I might fold AA here because:
-If I win, I'm only increase my stack about ~20+ BBs, which probably still keeps me near the bottom of the stack sizes.
-If I lose, I'm still out in 9th place. Or 10th place in your scenario.
-If I fold, I am giving up increasing my stack, but I have a good chance and jumping up the pay ladder. If they're huge jumps, this might be worth folding instead of risking it for what is still a short stack.
6) Every time, any hand pre flop has 50% chances, YES i perfectly know poker maths
...I don't think you do.
but the fact is that you only know 1 hand before the flop, and it's your hand. It is AA, Will it win or will it loose ? Chances are 50\50.
...Yes, it's 50/50 in the sense that you either win or lose the hand. However, if we're talking true mathematics, AA has a much greater chance than 50% of winning vs ATC.
It's like having a dialogue with single person, equal in education and temperament with you, most of the time it's 50\50.
...Eh, I don't think this is the same thing.
The same is when you're talking with big audience - it's you vs audience, still 50\50. However each person in audience is included in the other 50%, so you're in better position against each single person of the audience.
...What?
That's why talking to many people is easy, that's how priests fool people with their religions in churches for example.The same happens at the poker table. it's you vs the audience
...What? No, it's not. I don't have to get through an audience of people just to win a tournament. I have to get through the remaining players in the tournament.
and you've got that Buddha or Jesus Christ or whatever all of the ancient Egypt\Greece Gods in your hand all together... So when you see pocket aces and couple of re-raises before you - just move your stack at the middle of the table and relax.
...And this has to do with any type of God because...? This is pretty much a standard play in most situations, no matter what your religious belief is.
Cheers