I prefer AK because most of the plays are tribet or allwin preflop, and I usually end up winning the hand, with jj it's more dangerous to play if you do something stupid it will be your end.
I don't particularly like either of them. Both tend to make us too bold and are not all that good hands. Especially in online games, where a lot of people call with hands that should automatically fold.
With online poker AK. Players most always play Aces, raggy ta boot, and usually play Ks. JJ no good when there are 4 or 5 players in the hand. I only big bet JJ in position.
I'll take big slick over jj 90% of the time. And If it's suited, 95% of the time. The only time I want jj heads up is if I'm the big stack and I'm going for the knockout. Idk the percentages but I feel like ak is the winner more often than not.
I prefer JJ, but it's hard to play against someone who is holding AK, and I think AK will always be dangereus, becouse they are the cards that most appears in board , we'll see one of them in every 2 or 3 hands .
JJ the most insidious starting hand in hold'em and it's a pity to throw it out against 4 bet and it's absolutely impossible to play postflop in a 3 bet pot
It depends on the situation, if the opponent plays poorly with AK, then it is better to have such a hand, that is, the difference depends on the mistakes that the players make.