pcgnome
Legend
Silver Level
I will stop spamming CC very soon.
Of course he is. imo, no way he'd ever miss it!I don't think Helmuth is even playing the main event.
Close but I think you mean > "George Kostanza" hereGrinder has busted. I like the chances of someone like George Lind or Steve Gross. Guys are due!
I think I just posted a tweet about his entrance.Of course he is. imo, no way he'd ever miss it!
That's an old signature, so you probably missed it. C'mon it's Saturday night. Loosen up & post all you want!My God, please one time
Follow this link for the information you seek:Is there a site to get a complete list of those still in the ME? The WSOP site seems to show only about 90 players left from day1a.
Hi PO, Is there a site to get a complete list of those still in the ME? The WSOP site seems to show only about 90 players left from day1a.[/quote][quoteGeorge Kostanza (from Seinfeld) is sitting in 148th after Day 1a (63,150 chips)
Go George!!!!
Wow!!
Notable Chip Counts
Jamie Kerstetter - 91,925
Jamie is a new friend of mine - met and hung out with her on my recent Vegas trip. She lost her id on Friday night and was worried that she wouldn't be able to play - but it got turned in and she got it back yesterday.
Awesome girl and awesome poker player!!!
Yay! Yes. Go Jamie go!!!!
(Still waiting for the inevitable day that a woman takes this down )
WSOP E MainEvent 2007 -> Annette Obrestad not too bad imoYou say inevitable but a female has not won a WSOP event- that's ANY EVENT(excluding the ladies event LDO)- since I believe Vanessa Rousso back in 2008. That's gotta be well over 100 events. Considering they make up about 4% of the fields they should realistically be winning 1/25 events. I'm not attempting to make this a men are better than women at poker thread, but it's a highly disappointing stat.
You say inevitable but a female has not won a WSOP event- that's ANY EVENT(excluding the ladies event LDO)- since I believe Vanessa Rousso back in 2008. That's gotta be well over 100 events. Considering they make up about 4% of the fields they should realistically be winning 1/25 events. I'm not attempting to make this a men are better than women at poker thread, but it's a highly disappointing stat.
I think it can be watched on ESPN3 (but I don't get it w my int provider )is it possible to Watch WSOP main event on internet?
You say inevitable but a female has not won a WSOP event- that's ANY EVENT(excluding the ladies event LDO)- since I believe Vanessa Rousso back in 2008. That's gotta be well over 100 events. Considering they make up about 4% of the fields they should realistically be winning 1/25 events. I'm not attempting to make this a men are better than women at poker thread, but it's a highly disappointing stat.
You say inevitable but a female has not won a WSOP event- that's ANY EVENT(excluding the ladies event LDO)- since I believe Vanessa Rousso back in 2008. That's gotta be well over 100 events. Considering they make up about 4% of the fields they should realistically be winning 1/25 events. I'm not attempting to make this a men are better than women at poker thread, but it's a highly disappointing stat.
I don't think the MainEvent just attracts the 'best' players. imo it's about $10k & a dream. Personally I think if they upped the buyin a bunch, it would lose alot of what it currently has going for it.This will be the best year in the past couple for the pro name players to represent at the final table. < why? Depends on what the final count is on entries.< why? (incidentally the total # of entries this year is 6,865 which is the 3rd largest) The lesser number of entries, the better the chances for the pros. < I think the difference in number of entrants is negligible I think they should have upwardly adjusted the fee for the main event each year for inflation. Ten thousand dollars in 1970 was a lot of money. I think it should be around sixty thousand to get in now. That takes out a lot of pretenders.