How is the performance of a poker player evaluated? Is skill and knowledge more important? How much does luck and variance influence? A good hand with a bad decision can make you a tournament. What do you think?
I count on both but as luck has a quick influence during a tournament the skill prevails a lot, for example I feel a huge pressure during the tournament when the blinds go up when I look and see other players go further and I get eliminated from tournament with 20bb AKo in position I compromised my entire tournament against an A9s that ended with the 9 on the river all in preflop action. here my opponent has at least 6% more strength in his cards is out of position and desperate not to fall just like me lol, well the question is was it luck? or should I have a folded strategy and go a little further in the tournament? So for that reason when luck and skill are in question I count on both luck and skill.How is the performance of a poker player evaluated? Is skill and knowledge more important? How much does luck and variance influence? A good hand with a bad decision can make you a tournament. What do you think?
Skill and knowledge are important and you know it, those are the two ways to know if a player is performing well, that variance exists, and that bad luck is also real. The life of Poker is that with ups and downs, so is the duality of things in life. You have the knowledge, put it into practice and it will become wisdom with the experience you gather ... Greetings friend.:rock:How is the performance of a poker player evaluated? Is skill and knowledge more important? How much does luck and variance influence? A good hand with a bad decision can make you a tournament. What do you think?