Turbo or regular.Hyper is too fast and deep is to slow,but if you ask me what is perfect i guess it is turbo.
i think that regular speed is the best way to play and enjoy a real poker game.
in turbo or hyper you have to win hand so you play without rules you play sometmes like a fool and somtimes you win but in 90 % you loose.
other thing is that to win in hyper or turbo you need too much luck but in regular you have to play well to win like a professional player and that is good ))
In principle, I like turbo tournaments - but it also depends on the number of players - the more, the faster the tournament
I prefer turbo speed but what's more important for me are the other mtt features. I avoid any with a 2 hour registration period...that's just nuts. I like the ones with 1 hour or less for late regs. I also try to avoid the re-buy mtts. Too often you see crazy betting simply because the players know they can buy back in.
My preference are regular but my time available does not allow constantly play as I would like! so game but turbos and to learning to like
I like slow tourneys better than turbos
But since I have a family I can't afford being on poker all day long so I play turbos and hypers
You should know, the Turbo Series are on Pokerstars
gl gl gl
I enjoy quick response because second thoughts can be detrimental to your tournament; although, quick response can also be the wrong response. Had a small straight on the flop and ignored the four clubs that ended clubbing me good. Ouch! GOD bless you.I like to play at "Turbo" speed, not too fast like "Hyper Turbo" and not too slow like "Regular". I think the "Turbo" is the right measure. Which do you prefer and why?
I like to play at "Turbo" speed, not too fast like "Hyper Turbo" and not too slow like "Regular". I think the "Turbo" is the right measure. Which do you prefer and why?
I prefer regular speed, since it keep stacks deeper, which allow for more play and skill edge. However on PokerStars I have noticed, that regular speed tournaments tend to play 20-30% less hands per hour than turbo tournaments, presumably because people are given more time to act. This I actually find rather annoying, because often you see people use their entire time allowance just to make a trivial decision preflop, and it really slows the action down. And I am not even talking about bubble play here. This happen already in the first blind levels.
This incredibly slow pace, where a regular tournament on Stars might only play 40 hands per hour, also negate some of the effect of longer blind intervals, since the important is, how many hands you play per blind interval, not how long it last. Cuppled with the excessively large fields, which make a regular tournament last 8 hours or more, there is certainly a case to be made for playing turbos on PokerStars.
Chess takes up the rest of my free time that poker doesn't. I am a huge lover of chess.:burnout:
I very much agree with you. Especially in the PS regular season, the blind growth time is too slow. Playing a game often takes half a day, and the Turbo is just right. The 5-hour game is not as lucky as the Hyper Turbo
Normal pace for me, some of the upper turbo's just turn into bingo games at the end and I am probably the worlds worst bingo player and 3 outers and stuff like 10 2 suited tend to beat me about 70% of the time late in tourneys. I would rather feel like I have a little bit more control than just open shoving or calling an all in at the final three tables of a tourney on nearly every hand. Did I mention I get destroyed by bingo hands?
Regular seems my speed, the hyper turbos are super luck based and the blinds kill me and I end up out really late..
However I do like the survival mode on ACR those are actually fun.
I prefer regular and deep stack tournaments ... I have no problem with playing long sessions ... I understand that BB changes go slowly but it allows me to do my game calmly ... On the other hand, Hyper or Turbo tournaments must be playing many middle hands and in many cases the variance plays against you ... and you are simply eliminated from the tournament ...!
When I have time I like to play the slow ones, but I like turbos because there is little time to think and make quick decisions and the hyper seems to me that you have to be very lucky
When choosing a tournament, first of all, I pay attention to how much time I can play poker, and then I choose a tournament in which I will play !!! I love all tournaments, regardless of the speed of the tournament, and my limitation when choosing a tournament is time at a particular moment !!!
Definitely the deep stacked torunaments. I don't really like to gamble my tournament life too much. In turbo's its mostly pre-flop all-ins, i like to play postflop.
For me it really depends on my mood that day and how long I want to play for
If I want some quick action and just a 'fix' then hypers are great. If I'm doing a short evening session turbos fit the bill. But if I want to maximize my skill edge I like a slow structure.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yPT40CRvcuo&list=PLBrNnyWekagPbegY51h0xW4tHOFKKn_DU&index=2&t=0s
Here's a little video I made on when it makes sense to play each different type of MTT, hope you enjoy it!
I definitely prefer a longer game. For me it means more hands and being able to wait for good hands. I genuinely am not a fan of trying to bluff with crappy hands.