I would look at picking one site or the other if it was up between those two, Logan. If you can't get rakeback on FT, then I would definitely go with stars. But that would save you $50 right off the bat just in software. Plus you'd be able to manage your roll a lot better and get more hands on regs quicker. Just sayin'.
Already have rakeback in Fulltilt, thing is, dg, that 1 site don´t fill all my needs.
I play the $2 S&G regularly in fulltilt and trying to go to $5´s, the sattys for BLT are gold for BR boost (have a 51% ITM after 40 games), i like the $6 to double deuce sattys, the $3 Ko´s, and play regularly a forum league with money added and prizes, Cardchat games too, also im starting to look for some Mtts.
In Stars i like more the software, no minimun to cashout, play the $3 S&G´s, play the CC summer league there, i like the 1/4million $2 sattys, start to play Mtts also.
Then i have Merge, only thing that play there is private games, and also Mtts (less players more overlays) games don´t take the 8 hours like the others, have rakeback there too.
And Cake, no volume there of players to can play S&G´s but same like merge, play Mtts with less numbers (Cake don´t aloud Huds wich mean is full of fish because most good players stay out), also have rakeback there.
I play really early S&G in Fulltilt, then late or night S&G in Stars, if want to play Mtts usually open the 3 or 4 sites and pick a game in each one so can be playing 4 Mtts at the same time, if only leave 1 site will need to stick only with S&G´s and just 1 mtt running at given hour. So is really hard for me to not have more than 1 site.
What i am thinking is maybe take out something from some and put it in others to balance and have all with same level amounts, this way could play in same level in all.
Is never easy
