Knockout Holdem

TheDude6622

TheDude6622

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Jul 30, 2018
Total posts
2,348
Awards
2
Chips
0
From my perspective, I see a lot more loose play and loose calls. I try to pick my spots and be ready to play some big pots from time to time. Just make sure your holdings are strong enough to play, or be extremely patient and wait until after the first or second break to make moves.
 
cranberry

cranberry

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Nov 16, 2016
Total posts
1,588
Awards
4
Chips
0
I like to play knockout tournaments. I try to stick to standard game tactics. But it should be remembered, that the main goal is the prize zone, and the prizes for knocked out players are secondary.
 
teebahnoo

teebahnoo

Enthusiast
Silver Level
Joined
Dec 17, 2019
Total posts
79
Chips
0
In KO everyone’s more aggressive and more lose than usual therefore tight is right. You can often get ITM playing mostly top hands. However, if more people play tight at the table then play more hands with implied odds against them when over 50bb effective stack. Most KO are turbo, otherwise you can be looser until 30-ish.

Also you have much less fold equity regardless how you play until deep in the run. This is why the best place to be a short stack is a KO tournament. You often get to triple up or more and then become the table leader in no time.

As strategy, I try to swing only up mostly from a short stack. I play tightly with no fear (what an unusual association) and conservative. The only times I don’t get ITM is when I don’t fold in marginal spots which still happens way too often, unfortunately.
 
Last edited:
ASMautoneJr

ASMautoneJr

Visionary
Bronze Level
Joined
Dec 1, 2017
Total posts
622
Awards
2
Chips
80
change the strategy, to form a hunt KO, this is a simple and differentiated change, playing more aggressively.
 
skaniol

skaniol

Visionary
Bronze Level
Joined
Dec 12, 2018
Total posts
754
Awards
2
BG
Chips
110
But it should be remembered, that the main goal is the prize zone, and the prizes for knocked out players are secondary.
In KO everyone’s more aggressive and more lose than usual therefore tight is right. You can often get ITM playing mostly top hands.
This doesn't make sense to me. In KO, you barely win your buyin back when you just get ITM, unlike most other tournaments. Very often you win even less. I often consider to play for the min-cash, when I want to reduce the variance, but I never considered the KO tournaments to be suitable for this strategy. What am l missing here?

The smaller your stack gets, the harder it's in KO to avoid multi-way pots. The value of the top starting hands decreases significantly against several other players. It's hard for me to associate a tight, short-stacked playstyle with the KO tournaments at all, but you even say that KO is the best place to be short-stacked, while admitting that most of them are turbo too. I am not going to claim you are wrong. I hope this works for you. I am just a little confused :hmmmm:.
 
teebahnoo

teebahnoo

Enthusiast
Silver Level
Joined
Dec 17, 2019
Total posts
79
Chips
0
This doesn't make sense to me. In KO, you barely win your buyin back when you just get ITM, unlike most other tournaments.
The fact that almost everyone in this thread recommends lose aggro style should be telling enough. Remember, "do the opposite of your opponents"?

Also, it seems you exclude winning any bounty before money if you play tight. You will usually enter the pot with better hands than lose aggro people, you have better chances.

I can give you this example for yesterday Saturday eliminator on poker stars. I won 1 bounty before the money with a low straight (playing a hand with good implied odds from late position). So, I got $6.2 plus $23.78 vs the buy-in of $27 and a stack of 17bb. This is close to what you say. Next, one of the lose aggro guys with $30-ish bounty loses his stack playing too lose and goes all-in on tilt. Yours truly of course KO him with AQ.

That's how you make money playing tight in KO. The bounties are bigger the deeper you get and you need but one strike to get ahead with the money. Most of the time, your odds will be better than your opponents' so in average you'll get there.
 
M

Mikeloti13

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Dec 11, 2017
Total posts
479
Chips
0
For me it does. But i dont play them very often. If i want though i play it differently. Your shoving range in some situation is wider cause there is bounty in place. I play it more loose than usual tournaments. But still serious
 
L

luskata27

Enthusiast
Silver Level
Joined
Jan 3, 2020
Total posts
79
Chips
0
For me personally, the game should be the same as in standard tournaments.
 
theRaven68

theRaven68

Legend
Bronze Level
Joined
Nov 16, 2013
Total posts
2,336
Awards
2
Chips
1
My strategy doesnt change, I play it same as other tournaments
 
nghoffman

nghoffman

Rock Star
Bronze Level
Joined
May 10, 2014
Total posts
492
Chips
0
I think the mistake nearly every player makes when playing KO tourneys is "going after" the KOs. I find that it's better to just sit and wait for a big hand, because you can easily double up through others who are playing with weaker holdings. If you can survive until the bigger bounties are available, then you can aggressively go after those bounties.
 
Redbull199030

Redbull199030

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Jan 4, 2020
Total posts
206
Chips
0
I have the same strategy as for regular tournaments
 
Live Dealer Holdem - Texas Holdem Poker Rules
Top