When asking what site(s) is/are good it really depends upon what you believe makes a site 'good'. For some it's good software. For others it's a large variety of games on offer, including mixed games. For others it's huge player pools for tournaments & for some it's who offers the most freerolls.
I can give you an answer but it'd be lengthy.
When I’m asking what you think is best it’s obviously up to you to rank what makes a pokersite best in some form of games. I think all of those matter but maybe not equally. I can tell you that at the moment I can play only with my tablet so that needs to be in the consideration for me.
But the point was that I wanted to know what all of you think about this. So cash games micro and low, what’s the best and why? Tournaments freeroll/micro/low, what’s the best and why? You can also brake down some of those by different qualities but then you have to be very specific about how much better one quality is compared to another.
You can make your answer as lengthy as you like. I promise that I will read anything at least up to 10000 words and if you make it crear, precise, interesting and informative I will make time for it for another 10000 words and I’ll propably even respond to it at some point after reading it.
So please, go ahead. I’m also known for my very lengthy posts in some circles and people keep telling me that they love ’em and can’t stop reading them after I’ve hooked them in early. Even this is also a lengthy post it isn’t written to be easy and light reading so this isn’t an example of those kind of posts.
I’ll look forward for your lengthy post and hopefully still more well thought opinions from some other posters, but if you think it helps you can post your lengthy opinions in several little shorter posts.