The point I was making is that how do you know "Bigboy58" or "Pokergirl75" are not superuser accts. An account name is not going to determine if it's a superuser.Not sure how you can't see the HUGE relevance of Bodog's anonymous tables being a potential huge problem because of how it opens it up for cheating.
Also, I don't agree with those who figure that the only reason some don't like the anonymous tables is because players who use PT3/HEM can no longer use it. It's like you put that blanket statement out there as if you for sure know the reason.
Personally I think the way the anonymous tables are done at Bodog is freak'n terrible. For myself it lessens the game of poker to something far simpler.. it takes away from the very game of 'poker'. Makes for a boring, simplistic version of the game of poker. I think it's a huge fail.
The point I was making is that how do you know "Bigboy58" or "Pokergirl75" are not superuser accts. An account name is not going to determine if it's a superuser.
Just personally, my success' on Bovada have given me the satisfaction in knowing I'm not being cheated.
Anybody that thinks a site is cheating them (aside from payout issues) just needs to get better at the game imo.
The thing is the names can be tracked/monitored by sites like PTR etc which would, in theory, detect unusual patterns etc. It has happened in the past where cheaters have been caught this way. You just have to realize that by playing on Bovada that you give up that layer of security. You also "give-up" the ability of everyone to use sites like PTR/SharkScope and far, far worse cheater sites against you. So, like most things, it is a trade-off. I actually applaud Bovada for taking a stand against all these "helper" apps and giving players a choice. No one makes you play there. If you like their format; fine play there. If not; there are tons of other choices.
As has already been stated > if there's a screename, it can be tracked & then proven (with anonymous #'s there's no hope for this).The point I was making is that how do you know "Bigboy58" or "Pokergirl75" are not superuser accts. An account name is not going to determine if it's a superuser.
Just personally, my success' on Bovada have given me the satisfaction in knowing I'm not being cheated.
Anybody that thinks a site is cheating them (aside from payout issues) just needs to get better at the game imo.
As has already been stated > if there's a screename, it can be tracked & then proven (with anonymous #'s there's no hope for this).
Because you've had some success on the site, you know you're not being cheated? (maybe you've been fortunate with what tables you've been sitting at... how would you even know... or find out if you suspected? You can't!).
Your comment "anyone who thinks the site is cheating them just needs to get better at the game" is a joke.
a) you're not that good (imo)... 3bet/folding 1/2 your stack, getting near 4to1 & folding> showing AK is 'not that good' (hint > why 3bet there if you EVER have the intentions of folding? ... but then timing down 'forever'.. .folding & showing AK.. shows you didn't even have a plan (just an example of why I think > you're not that good).
Also, what? So you're assuming that if someone feels the site is 'cheating' them >> equals 'they are losing'? That's pretty naive (imo)
Once Bodog went to 'anonymous' tables I withdrew near every penny from my roll on there (which wasn't that much because I didn't play there a whole lot before... I think it was $550 from a $50 deposit). I left $12 on my account. I figured enough for 1 CC buyin (& 1 other priv. buyin another group used to have on Bodog).
I've played ~ a dozen games since, withdrew another $1,200 & have just over $100 left on there in my account (played the $100k 4x, cashed twice).
So I should play on there.. right? Nope. I hate that site. Only games I play in are the CC games & if I get lucky enough to win a ticket to the $100k, I play it too.
"IMO" it's a goofy site. It's like you're playing poker.... but there's very little 'poker' to it. How do you play 'real' poker without any metagame? Without any exploiting of other's tendancies & weaknesses? (aside from perhaps the super obvious noob/rookie failings ie. guys opening for 3-4x in LL's, players 3bet/folding when they've priced themselves, in, etc.). You can't even follow notes on other tables... nevermind 'other games'.
It's a joke & a huge fail imo.. nothing else.
way to assume again (you seem to be good at that) - - I type over 90words/min. (takes me a few mins. to write that post).
You didn't post the AK hand, but it stuck out so much I couldn't miss it.
No comment about my description of the 'non-poker' site bodog? Even on Pogo you can play some metagame stuff... on bodog.. forget about it.
I'm not American so I can't get into Bovada
Maybe it was at a live tourney in Michigan? (idk... I'm stumped ... it's all so confusing)I'm trying to make sense of that? Where did you see it if I didn't post it?
I reall do not like the fact that I don't know who I'm playing. It really is a perfect way for colusion. Normally if I see something at a table that doesn't look right between two players I make notes to that fact. Then if some day later I'm at a table and these same two players are there and it happens again I just leave,,, just my thoughts,,,and don't tell me I'm paranoid....because I already know that !! LOL
how can you know what player is that number when the numbers wont be the same its confusing too me as well.
I reall do not like the fact that I don't know who I'm playing. It really is a perfect way for colusion. Normally if I see something at a table that doesn't look right between two players I make notes to that fact. Then if some day later I'm at a table and these same two players are there and it happens again I just leave,,, just my thoughts,,,and don't tell me I'm paranoid....because I already know that !! LOL