*** Pokerstars buys Full Tilt ...... ***

jazzaxe

jazzaxe

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Jun 6, 2007
Total posts
1,050
Awards
1
Chips
0
Make sure that you put up a link when it happens. I will be the first to cash out. I remain, however, skeptical.
 
Kenzie 96

Kenzie 96

Legend
Loyaler
Joined
May 21, 2005
Total posts
13,711
Awards
9
US
Chips
176
on one hand i consider shaun deeb more credible than the average well-known online player -- on the other hand he once dressed up as a woman in order to play a poker tournament




And this is a problem because:confused: :)
 
cardriverx

cardriverx

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Oct 5, 2010
Total posts
1,441
Awards
1
Chips
0
FTP software > PS software but obviously PS won't change their software to FTPs.

All I really care about is the 1.4k I had on FTP -- and it seems with something like this that people would be able to sign into their old FTP accounts and W/D through PS?? (And hopefully us US players won't have to deal with filing with the DOJ?)

And people saying $750 mil in order to pay for the right to play in the US.. is that possible/legal?

Thanks
 
Demonomania

Demonomania

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Jan 27, 2012
Total posts
324
Chips
0
Screw compassion for others, I have none. I wanted to know if there was a chance of these rooms being reopened for Americans. I do not care about any money any of you might have tied up in full tilt, it's not my problem

And now no one has any compassion to whether or not you ever get to play on PS again. :p

gl to you sir
 
Lafayette2

Lafayette2

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Feb 8, 2010
Total posts
195
Chips
0
A lot of people are saying monoply for Stars to get Full Tilt, while it might seem as that, but for the last year since Black Friday no company has stepped up. Merge has a number of sites, also Cake but not in the ballpark of second place after Pokerstars. As the announcers of 2+ 2 mentioned, its only a monoply if they are manipulating the market to attain there there dominance. Pokerstars earned their place by being a great company that cares about its clients. Youre worried about less competiton for Pokerstars, their is no competition for them now. I personally miss Pokerstars and Full Tilt in the US market and would like to see everthing done to help them comeback in the future.
 
vegasjj

vegasjj

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Apr 6, 2012
Total posts
1,885
Chips
0
PS software I prefer to FT software - which I prefer to all others.

Would love to see FT back - and my little $ back :) (just over $70)

The best would be to see e1 getting their money back - and all US players having the opportunity to play on a decent software again.

As far as monopoly... they practically are a monopoly now, and PS gained my respect big time - when it basically continued to process all banking transactions after Black Friday. So what if they are a monopoly? They offer a good software, good games, PROVEN SECURE FUNDS!

Go PS and good luck buying FT!
 
ALL IN CLUBS

ALL IN CLUBS

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Mar 12, 2010
Total posts
1,423
Chips
0
I emailed Pokerstars just to see what they would say about the situation

:rolleyes:

Removed the attachment because it had your email address in it!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
seqas

seqas

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Sep 15, 2010
Total posts
274
Chips
0
weeeeeeeeeeeee did read it to, i really hope its true and will become true lol.

full tilt poker got such a nice and clean software to play on along with stars.
 
woody19

woody19

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Jan 23, 2009
Total posts
2,184
Chips
0
please be true :) i really like pokerstars but fulltilt was my home :)
 
OMGITSOVER9K

OMGITSOVER9K

Cardschat Elite
Silver Level
Joined
Nov 29, 2011
Total posts
2,994
Chips
0
what was so special about the FTP software? I don't see whats so bad about Stars..
 
quintass

quintass

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Nov 14, 2005
Total posts
339
Chips
0
what was so special about the FTP software? I don't see whats so bad about Stars..

It was (or still is to non US players) the most "comfortable" software pacakge I've ever used. Easy to navigate, super hand history options, great betting button options, a nice selection of skins, user friendly cashier, large easy to read text and chat..... I just really liked the feel of it, ya know. Stars comes in a close second, but thats JMHO.
 
polingpower

polingpower

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Feb 22, 2006
Total posts
1,054
Chips
0
IT would be nice to get the $$ back..........
i for one WANT to thank CC ............if i get my roll back
as it was 0 bankroll BEFORE CC..... ................. i be REAL HAPPY to see the $$$:D
 
P

plainluck

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Jun 27, 2007
Total posts
290
Chips
0
Rumor is all over today that Pokerstars has bought Full Tilt - don't know if it is true or not - but appears to have merit from all I can find so far.

Unbelievably great news if true!

Will add details as we hear them!

***Edit - went searching for details and found this in a thread at 2p2:

PokerStars has reached an agreement with the U.S. Department of Justice to buy FTP. The things I heard:

* All players will be refunded 100%
* Both sites back online
* Both sites have promotions
* Employees remain in both places

Expect more news today.
Did this rumor perchance start on April 1st? The day my money is back in my bank I will start thinking about holding my breath.
 
Debi

Debi

Forum Admin
Administrator
Joined
Oct 13, 2006
Total posts
74,795
Awards
20
Chips
1,387
Did this rumor perchance start on April 1st? The day my money is back in my bank I will start thinking about holding my breath.

Nope - it started the day the thread was started.

To others - massive derail in this thread is over.
 
dj11

dj11

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Oct 9, 2006
Total posts
23,189
Awards
9
Chips
0
Personally , I solved all those software issues eons ago when I started making all my tables look almost identical. Green felt, dark to black background. These days, the only software issue I could talk about is the almost unintelligible Merge Lobby problem.

For the most part, the only difference essentially was the size of the action buttons. If multi-tabling, there ain't gonna be much if any chat, so chat issues go bye bye.

I still don't understand why Stars feels it is necessary to but Tilt. DoJ must have put one juicy carrot at the end of the stick it is holding over Stars, AND Stars gets Rush. Other than that it doesn't make much sense. If they did not buy Tilt, and since the GBT deal fell fallow, Tilt, and any competition it provided, would just fade into the courts, and Stars benefits from it's main competition just disappearing.

That carrot must be mighty juicy!
 
N

Neoblast

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
May 13, 2010
Total posts
342
Chips
0
Chances are pokerstars might get doj's trust in their business methods so we might see FTP again, it was my favourite rooms, favourite freerolls, promotions and even rush...
 
JohnBoyWWFC

JohnBoyWWFC

Grindddddd
Silver Level
Joined
Jan 11, 2010
Total posts
5,369
Chips
0
How can you not get it DJ? Think about how much money is tied up on FTP. Hundreds of millions. Instead of that being forever gone, it goes back into the poker community and eventually Stars gets more money. If they can also get US players back and playing on FTP it'll be even more money for them.
 
N

Neoblast

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
May 13, 2010
Total posts
342
Chips
0
Personally , I solved all those software issues eons ago when I started making all my tables look almost identical. Green felt, dark to black background. These days, the only software issue I could talk about is the almost unintelligible Merge Lobby problem.

For the most part, the only difference essentially was the size of the action buttons. If multi-tabling, there ain't gonna be much if any chat, so chat issues go bye bye.

I still don't understand why Stars feels it is necessary to but Tilt. DoJ must have put one juicy carrot at the end of the stick it is holding over Stars, AND Stars gets Rush. Other than that it doesn't make much sense. If they did not buy Tilt, and since the GBT deal fell fallow, Tilt, and any competition it provided, would just fade into the courts, and Stars benefits from it's main competition just disappearing.

That carrot must be mighty juicy!

That carrot is all the money FTP can make, heck If I had the millions I'd do it too.
It's a win win situation, yes you have to stand players bank and probably massive withdrawal at the begnning but still with all the money pokerstars move, they're more like a financial institution or bank that just a poker site...

Poker is business and ftp was the second in the whole cake...
 
dj11

dj11

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Oct 9, 2006
Total posts
23,189
Awards
9
Chips
0
How can you not get it DJ? Think about how much money is tied up on FTP. Hundreds of millions. Instead of that being forever gone, it goes back into the poker community and eventually Stars gets more money. If they can also get US players back and playing on FTP it'll be even more money for them.

Mostly all liabilities. If it were profitable to pay back the players, Full TIlt would have done it.

I think, but could be wrong about it, that even if Stars does acquire Tilt, the first thing that happens is the Tilt players requesting all their money back, certainly US players will be doing that. If the ROW players decide to take a wait and see attitude, then that still confuses things for Stars. Do they withdraw first, then wait and see? Do they leave money there, and wait and see? I think they mostly all pull out their money first. Huge Liability.

For the ROW players, they already (probably) have Stars, and only want US players back, which does not require Tilt in the picture.

The more I think about this, the bigger that carrot seems to have to be. Or perhaps the Rush/Zoom patent rights, which would loom large if Tilt were to dissolve, possibly larger than the $750 mil rumored. Over the length of a patent, that fast game (either one) will make more money than 100 times that purchase price. If Tilt does hold a patent on Rush, then Zoom will have already violated that patent, and billion dollar penalties would be small change in that case. It may be that Tilt, per se, doesn't hold the patent, perhaps the software company does. Tilt may have held only an exclusive license, in which case the terms of that exclusivity is the key question. Since Tilt will not have paid anything on that contract for quite some time now, the owner could claim default and offer the method to any fresh new bidder.

An argument could easily be made that the only asset Tilt has worth anything, is their Rush asset. Their case reserves are so tied up that they can not be seen as an asset. Any hardware they had is now a year out of date, tho their personnel could be considered an asset, they would be cheaper to recruit out of Tilt than to buy Tilt just to get them. There is no other White Knight that we have heard of.

But if you think it is only about the player pool, and keeping them interested, well, you keep on thinking that, it won't hurt one way or the other, but that ain't why they are interested.

It doesn't make sense....
 
Last edited:
cardriverx

cardriverx

Legend
Silver Level
Joined
Oct 5, 2010
Total posts
1,441
Awards
1
Chips
0
Mostly all liabilities. If it were profitable to pay back the players, Full TIlt would have done it.

I think, but could be wrong about it, that even if Stars does acquire Tilt, the first thing that happens is the Tilt players requesting all their money back, certainly US players will be doing that. If the ROW players decide to take a wait and see attitude, then that still confuses things for Stars. Do they withdraw first, then wait and see? Do they leave money there, and wait and see? I think they mostly all pull out their money first. Huge Liability.

For the ROW players, they already (probably) have Stars, and only want US players back, which does not require Tilt in the picture.

The more I think about this, the bigger that carrot seems to have to be. Or perhaps the Rush/Zoom patent rights, which would loom large if Tilt were to dissolve, possibly larger than the $750 mil rumored. Over the length of a patent, that fast game (either one) will make more money than 100 times that purchase price. If Tilt does hold a patent on Rush, then Zoom will have already violated that patent, and billion dollar penalties would be small change in that case. It may be that Tilt, per se, doesn't hold the patent, perhaps the software company does. Tilt may have held only an exclusive license, in which case the terms of that exclusivity is the key question. Since Tilt will not have paid anything on that contract for quite some time now, the owner could claim default and offer the method to any fresh new bidder.

An argument could easily be made that the only asset Tilt has worth anything, is their Rush asset. Their case reserves are so tied up that they can not be seen as an asset. Any hardware they had is now a year out of date, tho their personnel could be considered an asset, they would be cheaper to recruit out of Tilt than to buy Tilt just to get them. There is no other White Knight that we have heard of.

But if you think it is only about the player pool, and keeping them interested, well, you keep on thinking that, it won't hurt one way or the other, but that ain't why they are interested.

It doesn't make sense....

It's an investment. PS has the $$$ and they're willing to take the risk of a loss. Worst case scenario for them is they lose some cash, get Rush, and become even more respected in the poker community.

Good buy by PS.
 
PokerStars Guides: Italiano - Dansk - Nederlands - Deutsch - Français - Español - Polski - Norsk - Português - Svenska - PokerStars Mobile - Deutsch Mobile - PS Casino Related Full Tilt Reviews: English - Dutch - German - Spanish - Portuguese - FT Casino - Full Tilt Poker Mobile
Top