Why are you even asking if you don't care about the players.I do not care what I sounded like. I asked a question. Quit being so sensitive
+1Maybe nobody cares what questions you have.
On a serious note - be nice whether you care to be or not.
on one hand i consider shaun deeb more credible than the average well-known online player -- on the other hand he once dressed up as a woman in order to play a poker tournament
Why are you even asking if you don't care about the players.
+1
I do hope Stars buys FTP.
And this is a problem because
Screw compassion for others, I have none. I wanted to know if there was a chance of these rooms being reopened for Americans. I do not care about any money any of you might have tied up in full tilt, it's not my problem
what was so special about the FTP software? I don't see whats so bad about Stars..
Did this rumor perchance start on April 1st? The day my money is back in my bank I will start thinking about holding my breath.Rumor is all over today that Pokerstars has bought Full Tilt - don't know if it is true or not - but appears to have merit from all I can find so far.
Unbelievably great news if true!
Will add details as we hear them!
***Edit - went searching for details and found this in a thread at 2p2:
PokerStars has reached an agreement with the U.S. Department of Justice to buy FTP. The things I heard:
* All players will be refunded 100%
* Both sites back online
* Both sites have promotions
* Employees remain in both places
Expect more news today.
Did this rumor perchance start on April 1st? The day my money is back in my bank I will start thinking about holding my breath.
You might want to read the whole thread.Did this rumor perchance start on April 1st? The day my money is back in my bank I will start thinking about holding my breath.
Personally , I solved all those software issues eons ago when I started making all my tables look almost identical. Green felt, dark to black background. These days, the only software issue I could talk about is the almost unintelligible Merge Lobby problem.
For the most part, the only difference essentially was the size of the action buttons. If multi-tabling, there ain't gonna be much if any chat, so chat issues go bye bye.
I still don't understand why Stars feels it is necessary to but Tilt. DoJ must have put one juicy carrot at the end of the stick it is holding over Stars, AND Stars gets Rush. Other than that it doesn't make much sense. If they did not buy Tilt, and since the GBT deal fell fallow, Tilt, and any competition it provided, would just fade into the courts, and Stars benefits from it's main competition just disappearing.
That carrot must be mighty juicy!
How can you not get it DJ? Think about how much money is tied up on FTP. Hundreds of millions. Instead of that being forever gone, it goes back into the poker community and eventually Stars gets more money. If they can also get US players back and playing on FTP it'll be even more money for them.
Mostly all liabilities. If it were profitable to pay back the players, Full TIlt would have done it.
I think, but could be wrong about it, that even if Stars does acquire Tilt, the first thing that happens is the Tilt players requesting all their money back, certainly US players will be doing that. If the ROW players decide to take a wait and see attitude, then that still confuses things for Stars. Do they withdraw first, then wait and see? Do they leave money there, and wait and see? I think they mostly all pull out their money first. Huge Liability.
For the ROW players, they already (probably) have Stars, and only want US players back, which does not require Tilt in the picture.
The more I think about this, the bigger that carrot seems to have to be. Or perhaps the Rush/Zoom patent rights, which would loom large if Tilt were to dissolve, possibly larger than the $750 mil rumored. Over the length of a patent, that fast game (either one) will make more money than 100 times that purchase price. If Tilt does hold a patent on Rush, then Zoom will have already violated that patent, and billion dollar penalties would be small change in that case. It may be that Tilt, per se, doesn't hold the patent, perhaps the software company does. Tilt may have held only an exclusive license, in which case the terms of that exclusivity is the key question. Since Tilt will not have paid anything on that contract for quite some time now, the owner could claim default and offer the method to any fresh new bidder.
An argument could easily be made that the only asset Tilt has worth anything, is their Rush asset. Their case reserves are so tied up that they can not be seen as an asset. Any hardware they had is now a year out of date, tho their personnel could be considered an asset, they would be cheaper to recruit out of Tilt than to buy Tilt just to get them. There is no other White Knight that we have heard of.
But if you think it is only about the player pool, and keeping them interested, well, you keep on thinking that, it won't hurt one way or the other, but that ain't why they are interested.
It doesn't make sense....