On point, Spin and go is much closer to equal distribution over all participants and you can't really benefit from making better decisions because there are so few to makeThere are two problems with spins. The first is a very fast structure (hyperturbo), where you typically only start with 25BB, and then the blinds also go up fast. This create few chances to find edge against opponents, before the game is over. The other problem is the "jackpot" multipliers, which you will likely never hit, even you grind a ton. Typically its something like 1,5% of the price pool, which goes into making someone else rich. This acts like an extra rake, which you must also overcome to show a profit.
For these two reasons combined traditional SnGs are better, if you are looking to build up a bankroll, or for a regular source of income. But with this being said, you can play more Spins per hour, since each game last a shorter time. So if you get really good at them, and can find a good rake-back deal, then maybe they can still be profitable. Regardless which format you pick, dont expect to get rich. There is just not enough mid and high stakes action these days, and the opponents are also to good.
Hi.Of course it depends on each person's type of play, but in general, which do you guys think is the most profitable format to invest? I personaly prefere Sit & Go, but theoretically you have more chance to win 3 to 1 then 45 to 1, is it not?
Yes, spin & go is a different dinamic that in my opinion, comes down to luck factor much more then techniquesince the sit and go pays more, and if you are a decent player, i would say the sit and go, the spin and go, if you dont play for much, you have a lot of cowboys who go all in all the time
I agreeSnG's far better (to apply strategies). Spin'n go's, half lottery, but are kinda fun.
I don't consider poker an investment project at all. I just play in freerolls, accumulate a bankroll and gradually play in tournaments that my bankroll management system allows me to play. Overall, I would definitely prefer Sit and Go tournaments.Of course it depends on each person's type of play, but in general, which do you guys think is the most profitable format to invest? I personaly prefere Sit & Go, but theoretically you have more chance to win 3 to 1 then 45 to 1, is it not?
Im kind of the same, but after years playing im finally developing more of my game and studying the online poker considering it as a second income after my job. Then said, just like you, I try to manage my bankroll for a profit. And yes, mostly in freerolls and low stakes. Thats why I asked for your opinions in these online tournament formats,I don't consider poker an investment project at all. I just play in freerolls, accumulate a bankroll and gradually play in tournaments that my bankroll management system allows me to play. Overall, I would definitely prefer Sit and Go tournaments.
I agree there is less technique and have more of luck as a factor for the result in hyper speed or even spin & go. But I still like to play them, hahahHi.
Of course, I would prefer Sit and Go tournaments. In such tournaments, if they are not hyper tournaments of course, you can at least count on your skills and experience. Spin and Go tournaments are essentially a lottery.
Do you think he's looking for mid & high stakes action with either of these formats?, dont expect to get rich. There is just not enough mid and high stakes action these days, and the opponents are also to good.
LOL probably notDo you think he's looking for mid & high stakes action with either of these formats?