And what about 48 and 96 hands? ))) Are this hands more profitable for you?Don't like play with 58 and 97 hands. Never won with those hands.
And what about 48 and 96 hands? ))) Are this hands more profitable for you?
For me the whorst hand is 32o ))
I don't want to talk about garbages, I'm gonna talk about hands that you think are good but they are not, and they can make you loose to much money!
1. Q-T, for me this is the worst one, most of players think that it's good hand, but for me no! this hand is totally dominated by normal hands like Q-J , Q-K , T-K , T-A... even if you got top pair in the flop you are not sure what to do, you may loose because of your bad kicker!
2. J-8, this hand also may cost you a lot againt to many hands like J-T, J-9, J-Q, J-K... it can even make a real desastre against J-K if the flop comes Q-T-9. So there is to many reasons to fold this hand and not to play it at all.
So be carefall, and shoose between not to play those hands at all or playing this hands but very carefally.
So there is to many reasons to fold this hand and not to play it at all.
yep, you're right! usually one of the remaining jacks comes on the river to give K5o a straight...Well I think everything is quite relative and I don't particularly think the hands that you cited are bad. Notice, I don't know how your poker studies are doing, but in the example of J8 I wouldn't be afraid of KJ on a flop Q 9 10 I will tell you the reasons: This situation will happen much less often than you think, because if you have a J in your hand there are fewer KJ combos left in your opponent's hand. The chance you have the nuts and take all the chips of an opponent who has a pair of Q, or even two pairs like Q9, or a top pair with second highest kicker like KQ. So as you can see from this specific hand you will win all of your opponent's chips a lot more than losing.