Sometimes yes, sometimes not, it all depends on the situation. There are many factors that you did not describe, so it is difficult to give a correct answer. It depends on the format and structure of the tournament, the stage of the tournament, the number of players at the table, the buy-in, all these factors are important and must be taken into account.I'd say it's all about chip stack at that point.
Understandable 👍It will depend on some factors like phase of the tournament, amount of stack, with hand is (AA, KK, AQ etc) and how are the players at the table ( aggressive or tight). But for me if it’s top pair is always good ideia.
Great logicIt is a question that should be framed in a situation. There are times when all in preflop is the best option due to the situation you are in (few blinds, close to entering prizes, bad player in front, etc.)
Pace it safe 👌As always it depends. If you are s cheap leader and have a top hand sure. But if that is the beginning of a tournament and there are lots of loose players it is not a good idea. It would be a Little different with cash games but still with close stacks I wouldn't play all in. Maybe onky with AA and KK.
The chip stack is key 🔑When your stack is too short, there aren't many plays left. Going all in when you have a "playable" hand seems like the logical move to me.
On the other hand, if you are comfortable with your stack, it's more complicated.
As you rightly point out, I believe it heavily depends on the stack size.
Leaves it to common sense, great answer. 👍It depends... there is no 100% correct answer to the question unless you define the situation by informing us of the blinds, position, stage of the tournament and so on...
Accurate 🎯Making All-in in poker must be justified - this decision must bring profit over the long term, otherwise the losses from it will be significant.You should act with caution even with the strongest pocket cards if several opponents entered the auction with an all-in bet before you. If you match them in a multipot, the value of your hand will decrease significantly and the odds of winning may not be in your favor.
Sometimes it is necessaryI can't say it's a smart move, but I've moved all in a few times, I've won and lost, I can say I've lost more than I've won, but taking risks is always good, especially with good cards
Agreed 👍AA KK if you think you'll get callers, if not just raise and play them. Also depends on how many chips every1 has. If you have nothing yeah, if you are massive chip stack then probably yeah, but you might find every1 folds to all so better standard raise and get them out that way when you hit
Great example 👍Fish are preflop with 30bb+. If your stack is less than 20bb, then you bank will be the right decision, in other situations it's a donkey. I often see it like 888 poker that the first hand of the tournament, and the stacks are 100bb, and the fish go to the bank, well, they take the oini stack, so what did they achieve? The fact that they no longer have 100, but 103-105bb at worst, they fall for the same fish and lose.
Still risky, always risky 😬If you have big advantage in stack, I think you can scarry out your opponents who have small stack - they are afraid of BB and ante and they have to check almost everything if they have only one card in hand above 10. But if you have another player with big stack I think it's risky to go all-in, althought you have high pair like JJ QQ KK AA.
There is no correct answer, with the knowledge your giving I would agree hands down. 🙌Sometimes yes, sometimes not, it all depends on the situation. There are many factors that you did not describe, so it is difficult to give a correct answer. It depends on the format and structure of the tournament, the stage of the tournament, the number of players at the table, the buy-in, all these factors are important and must be taken into account.
Pure factsNot all the time going all in pre flop is a smart play, 80% going all in on the pre flop is a disaster waiting to happen, You need to be carful knowing your odds and the players you play against.