how can you say AK wins more money... if you A or K hits every folds and you win a medium size pot... but the time that peopel dont fold they have the 2 pair or the set and you lose the big pot, n e way AK is way over rated AK vs 47off suit preflop is 60% to 40% not a dominating hand.... and thats just one caller only time AK dominates is to AQ, AJ, KQ n e other hand its not that great
It's maddening that people continue to post this kind of information as if it were factual. It's grossly incorrect. Not only that, the 60/40 coinflip theory has already been posted and corrected in this very thread.
According to the Cardplayer
poker odds calculator, AK vs. 47, all different suits, is 64.02:35.06, which is nearly 2:1. That is a big advantage.
Why do you lose a big pot if the opponent hits a set or two pair? Is it because the only move you know is all in, or because once you get AK you're playiing it all the way to the river no matter what? Just because you play it poorly does not at all mean it's a bad hand.
If you want to spout, spout. If you really want to learn the power of AK, go back and read AlienGenius's post on the subject. Play it strong pre-flop, read the situation, possibly C-bet with it and be able to get away from it.
It dominates all other non-paired
hands and is a coin-flip to any pair. And for those who are petrified that the opponent might have AA or KK, well maybe you shouldn't be playing poker.
Gary