You should never be a pathetic calling station.

P

PokerJoeAAAA

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Dec 21, 2008
Total posts
165
Chips
0
I thought that suck outs like that only happened online!!!:D
 
B

bubonicplay

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Jan 21, 2010
Total posts
219
Chips
0
I could write a long post about how bets should have a purpose and when your opponent is likely to bluff later only folding out better hands is not smart or I could just say read over this entire thread hit ctrl+f and search marginal. Read all his posts. Hopefully you learn something because he knows what he's talking about and no offense but a lot of people posting here don't.
 
P

Pafkata

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
May 8, 2009
Total posts
192
Chips
0
But you'd be missing out on a river bluff by Elky if he is holding worse. Why would want a player to fold their bad hands when you have them beat? That doesn't make a lot of sense.

It does make lots of sense while playing a tournament. You can't afford to be outdrawn when there's a big pot in the middle. You'd better take it now with the best hand rather than get outdrawn and lose a huge pot.

Top pair top kicker hands are not unbeatable. They are definitely the nuts against hyper-aggressive player on the flop,but TPTK is often not the best hand when the river card hits.

Cash games are completely different and I can understand the logic about letting the hyper-aggro bluff some money, because most of the time I will win in such spots and if I get unlucky I can rebuy. But this is a tournament and chips are very valuable because you will be out very soon if you let few people outdraw you...

PS. I am sure Elky balances his river all-in range,but I'd bet he tries to bluff only when relatively shortstacked or against people who can't hurt his big stack... I doubt he ever bluffs on the river against someone with bigger chip stack than him when he is above the average stack!
 
moeraj

moeraj

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
May 15, 2009
Total posts
181
Chips
0
No offence to marginal but you need to bet after the flop here to try to find out where you stand with top pair and top kick and a very good chance to pick up the pot right there. I understand the theory behind Elky being a loose player but I still believe there are too many scare cards (overcards) in the deck to check this flop.You are letting too many potentially goofy hands to catch up to you here.
 
M

Marginal

Junior Member
Silver Level
Joined
Nov 28, 2009
Total posts
10,426
Awards
3
Chips
5
No offence to marginal but you need to bet after the flop here to try to find out where you stand with top pair and top kick and a very good chance to pick up the pot right there. I understand the theory behind Elky being a loose player but I still believe there are too many scare cards (overcards) in the deck to check this flop.You are letting too many potentially goofy hands to catch up to you here.

Donk betting the flop makes no sense, it allows elky to play his hand perfectly against us.
 
W

wetyeti

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Jan 3, 2010
Total posts
229
Chips
0
Marginal
Could you explain this a little more? As I stated earlier some of the stuff on this thread is over my head. I've been working on my game a lot and have seen quite a bit of improvement. In this Toth vs. Elky example it seems like every idea on how I would play it is poor. Please advise.

Donk betting the flop makes no sense, it allows elky to play his hand perfectly against us.
 
M

Marginal

Junior Member
Silver Level
Joined
Nov 28, 2009
Total posts
10,426
Awards
3
Chips
5
It means that, elky can safely fold all his bluffs/worse hands while getting maximum value from the hands that have our range beat.
 
W

wetyeti

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Jan 3, 2010
Total posts
229
Chips
0
Thanks Marginal. So with that idea Toth played the hand correct and simply got unlucky. Happens to all of us
 
Kasanova King

Kasanova King

Visionary
Silver Level
Joined
Aug 7, 2009
Total posts
798
Chips
0
But you'd be missing out on a river bluff by Elky if he is holding worse. Why would want a player to fold their bad hands when you have them beat? That doesn't make a lot of sense.

...In a sense, its like saying when I bet, I want all bad hands to fold and only good/better hands to call me.


That argument makes perfect sense for cash games and EV.

In tournament play, especially on the final table, it does not hold water. If your opponent hits any of his outs, you are dead in the water. Tournament play at that point is indeed about taking the pot down, protecting your hand, surviving and moving on to the next hand.
 
Monoxide

Monoxide

Cardschat Elite
Silver Level
Joined
Jul 19, 2007
Total posts
3,657
Chips
0
I dont understand how thats not a +ev play in a tournament.

The more chips you gain, the better chance at achieving the main goal of a tournament, to win 1st prize. If elky "gives" you the option to either win a small pot quickly eliminating any future bets, or win a huge pot by playing the hand to its maximum value... thats always the correct option. If the money truely means so much to the particular player in terms of moving up the ladder, then its a huge hinderance on your ability to play and basically cripples you, i know from experience in being in this situation before.

Also considering how many chips toth had, he isnt even eliminated if he loses the hand plus having a chance to pick off elky on a bluff and knock out him out? The value in that alone is immense in moving up the ladder.
 
J

joemac696969

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Mar 19, 2007
Total posts
219
Chips
0
Don't know if I could call a reraie with that crap, but I know that feeling though!
 
5TR8 FLUSH

5TR8 FLUSH

Legend
Platinum Level
Joined
May 26, 2009
Total posts
1,719
Awards
4
US
Chips
263
I think toth played the hand correctly, it was just unfortunate and very unlucky that elky made the straight on the river. I hardly recognized elky because i'm use to seeing a crazy looking white dude with bright blond hair, LOL. :)
 
T

thepit89

Enthusiast
Silver Level
Joined
Jul 15, 2009
Total posts
39
Chips
0
jeez, toth should have tried to get a feel of the table on the flop, his fault.
 
Kasanova King

Kasanova King

Visionary
Silver Level
Joined
Aug 7, 2009
Total posts
798
Chips
0
I dont understand how thats not a +ev play in a tournament.

The more chips you gain, the better chance at achieving the main goal of a tournament, to win 1st prize. If elky "gives" you the option to either win a small pot quickly eliminating any future bets, or win a huge pot by playing the hand to its maximum value... thats always the correct option. If the money truely means so much to the particular player in terms of moving up the ladder, then its a huge hinderance on your ability to play and basically cripples you, i know from experience in being in this situation before.

Also considering how many chips toth had, he isnt even eliminated if he loses the hand plus having a chance to pick off elky on a bluff and knock out him out? The value in that alone is immense in moving up the ladder.


It could be...it could also get you busted (or at least severely crippled). In that situation you would need to take a step back and evaluate everything, not just go by EV b/c you can't buy back in. Sure, if you make the proper +EV move you will win over time but you may not win that hand - and in a tournament, it's about winning the hand.
 
slycbnew

slycbnew

Cardschat Elite
Silver Level
Joined
Aug 8, 2008
Total posts
2,876
Chips
0
It could be...it could also get you busted (or at least severely crippled). In that situation you would need to take a step back and evaluate everything, not just go by EV b/c you can't buy back in. Sure, if you make the proper +EV move you will win over time but you may not win that hand - and in a tournament, it's about winning the hand.

There's a balance we should be looking for here. If our goal is to win the tournament, we're going to take risks where we believe the opportunity outweighs the risk. Winning a given hand for the minimum amount (here, re-raising pf or a c/r on the flop or turn would have accomplished that) is certainly the safe route, but doesn't maximize our opportunity to win the tourney.

There's an opportunity here to take Elky's entire stack AND knock out an extremely dangerous player - if we think the risk that Elky's actually got a hand is greater than the opportunity to significantly increase our stack and knock a dangerous player out of the tournament, than certainly we should be looking to take the pot down quickly.

If we're looking to coast into the money, we could also simply fold AJ pf in Toth's spot (which is clearly what Elky wanted to happen) - I'm assuming Toth's stack is large enough to accomplish that.

I'm pretty sure Toth is playing to win the tourney, is aware of the risks and opportunities, and chooses a dangerous line that, if it pays off, puts him in a pretty commanding situation in the tourney - and, if it doesn't pay off, doesn't knock him out of the tourney either.
 
bgomez89

bgomez89

Resident Thugmaster
Silver Level
Joined
Jan 3, 2009
Total posts
3,127
Chips
0
How did toth not play it right? The guy gets 4bet and calls to see a flop and he hits top pair top kicker. With Elky being as aggro as he is, one would expect him to bet this flop since he made the 4bet; donk betting this would just be retarded. On the turn I like the check because with a 3rd spade out there and an over card, it'd be dangerous for us to bet since as some others mentioned he calls with hands that have us crushed and folds out the ones we beat. By check/calling we have the opportunity to keep the pot small with our small hand and see if we can either improve our hand by the river or call an ok sized bet on the river.

I have no idea why some of the people in this thread think toth is "slowplaying" or being a "calling station" in this hand but whatever.

That being said i probably wouldn't have called the river shove with just 2nd pair
 
Kasanova King

Kasanova King

Visionary
Silver Level
Joined
Aug 7, 2009
Total posts
798
Chips
0
There's a balance we should be looking for here. If our goal is to win the tournament, we're going to take risks where we believe the opportunity outweighs the risk. Winning a given hand for the minimum amount (here, re-raising pf or a c/r on the flop or turn would have accomplished that) is certainly the safe route, but doesn't maximize our opportunity to win the tourney.

There's an opportunity here to take Elky's entire stack AND knock out an extremely dangerous player - if we think the risk that Elky's actually got a hand is greater than the opportunity to significantly increase our stack and knock a dangerous player out of the tournament, than certainly we should be looking to take the pot down quickly.

If we're looking to coast into the money, we could also simply fold AJ pf in Toth's spot (which is clearly what Elky wanted to happen) - I'm assuming Toth's stack is large enough to accomplish that.

I'm pretty sure Toth is playing to win the tourney, is aware of the risks and opportunities, and chooses a dangerous line that, if it pays off, puts him in a pretty commanding situation in the tourney - and, if it doesn't pay off, doesn't knock him out of the tourney either.


I agree for the most part, you do need to take risks to win and I do think Toth played it right, up until the river. At that point, he should have taken a step back and re-evaluated the situation.
 
M

Marginal

Junior Member
Silver Level
Joined
Nov 28, 2009
Total posts
10,426
Awards
3
Chips
5
I agree for the most part, you do need to take risks to win and I do think Toth played it right, up until the river. At that point, he should have taken a step back and re-evaluated the situation.

I honestly think you are being a little results oriented here. The river does not really change anything.
 
Kasanova King

Kasanova King

Visionary
Silver Level
Joined
Aug 7, 2009
Total posts
798
Chips
0
I honestly think you are being a little results oriented here. The river does not really change anything.


I think you need to be a little results oriented in tournament poker, much more so than in cash games - especially on the final table. The gutshot draw was within A.S.'s range. When A.S. shoved river, Toth needed to realize he was beat.
 
M

Marginal

Junior Member
Silver Level
Joined
Nov 28, 2009
Total posts
10,426
Awards
3
Chips
5
I think you need to be a little results oriented in tournament poker, much more so than in cash games - especially on the final table. The gutshot draw was within A.S.'s range. When A.S. shoved river, Toth needed to realize he was beat.
I do not know why I continue with this hand because I/ no one hear was involved and were not there, do not know meta game etc but I continue cause I am an idiot.

Elky's shoving range on the river is very wide, it does not only consist of made hands and the river only hits a tiny portion of it. Once he calls the turn, he cannot be folding the river here.
 
Kasanova King

Kasanova King

Visionary
Silver Level
Joined
Aug 7, 2009
Total posts
798
Chips
0
I do not know why I continue with this hand because I/ no one hear was involved and were not there, do not know meta game etc but I continue cause I am an idiot.

Elky's shoving range on the river is very wide, it does not only consist of made hands and the river only hits a tiny portion of it. Once he calls the turn, he cannot be folding the river here.


Yeah, I agree, we don't know what was going on leading up to the hand. I still think he could have folded river - that's what makes some pros better than others, the ability to make those difficult laydowns.

I'm done talking about it though...I think it could have gone either way, the end result is that he made the call, lost the hand.
 
C

cAPSLOCK

Cardschat Elite
Silver Level
Joined
Jul 22, 2008
Total posts
2,550
Chips
0
Just watched the video. I can't see how you call Toth a "pathetic calling station" which I imagine several other of the 50 posts say. ;) I will read them after blabbing my own opinion.

Considering Elky's style and range I think calling the 4bet pre flop was justified. I might bet this flop... But other than that I can't fault any of the play.

The river card was a terrible thing for Toth as it was exactly the perfect storm card for Elky. Not just that it gave him the nuts... but it pretty much guaranteed 57 to be the ONLY hand Elky could win with, except for some weird queen.

Seems to be Elky got extraordinarily lucky in this hand... in fact about as lucky as you ever get in this game.
 
B

bubonicplay

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Jan 21, 2010
Total posts
219
Chips
0
That argument makes perfect sense for cash games and EV.

In tournament play, especially on the final table, it does not hold water. If your opponent hits any of his outs, you are dead in the water. Tournament play at that point is indeed about taking the pot down, protecting your hand, surviving and moving on to the next hand.

Sorry but this is just plain wrong.
 
Top