Transcendence
Visionary
Silver Level
The problem with this particular thread is people simply talking past each other.
No one is denying the origins of poker as a gambling game. No one is claiming that for many, the only form of poker is one where money is wagered.
The issue is people ignoring huge numbers of people engage in playing poker with no money involved. The implication (repeatedly) is poker without a real gamble is not interesting or involving.
That is patently nonsense. My estimate would be a several million people a week play poker for no stakes (one international play/practice site alone has close to 1.5 million members- heaven knows how many play US sites).
It feels as though some of those who play strictly for money feel irritated by the fact others do not play for money - as though such people do not take the game seriously. They obviously do and in large numbers.
In fact I would not be surprised to find in any given week around the world, more people are playing poker with no stakes involved than are actually gambling for money.
No no no, there chips have a price, this price is time. How can you not understand, no one will give you 1 000 000 000 conditional chips for free. They must be earned. All these free chips are just given to people to ignite the excitement that they would have bought chips for real money.