full tilt poker $0.25/$0.50 No Limit Hold'em - 8 players
The Official
DeucesCracked.com Hand History
Converter
SB: $97.50
BB: $50.00
UTG: $119.40
UTG+1: $33.95
MP1: $46.75
MP2: $25.00
CO: $74.85
Hero (BTN): $55.35
Pre Flop: ($0.75) Hero is BTN with 5
♥ 5
♣
2 folds,
MP1 raises to $1.50,
2 folds, Hero calls $1.50,
1 fold, BB calls $1
Flop: ($4.75) 4
♠ J
♣ 6
♠ (3 players)
BB checks, MP1 checks,
Hero bets $3.25,
BB raises to $10, MP1 folds, Hero calls $6.75
Turn: ($24.75) T
♣ (2 players)
BB checks,
Hero bets $13.25, BB calls $13.25
River: ($51.25) 3
♣ (2 players)
BB checks,
Hero bets $30.60 all in, BB folds
Final Pot: $51.25
Hero wins $48.70
(Rake: $2.55)
The original raiser in MP is a 13/8 nit, who plays very straightforward. Once he doesn't C-bet into 2 opponents, he is almost always done with the hand, so I try to take it down, but get check-raised by the BB.
Now the villain in the BB is a pretty TAG player. After my initial thought of "well, that didn't work", I thought of what was going through his head. He probably also knew the PFR was giving up, and that I would be stabbing with most of my pre-flop calling range. Yet, looking at the board, there were very few strong hands he could have, a spattering of draws, and a lot of air himself. If he had position on me, I would have given up, but, not believing him, I called, planning on seeing if he blinked later in the hand.
The turn makes the board very wet, doesn't complete any draws, and only helps TT and JT. Yet the villain checks. This villain was aggressive enough that if he check-raised the flop with a draw, I believed he would fire again, and certainly would have bet with a made hand. So I bet enough to make it look like I was value betting, but leaving enough for a decent sized bet on the river. When villain now calls, I'm putting him on some middle strength hand with showdown value, or a draw.
The river fills the backdoor flush, and a straight if villain had 75. Yet the villain checks once more. I don't put him at all on a flush, and he would most likely bet if his draw hit, or if he for some reason was slowplaying a strong hand this whole time. Since I actually have some marginal showdown value with my small pair, I gave thought to checking back, since I beat all of his non-pair draws. But it would really suck if had Jx or 6x or 99 and was getting sticky with them. Plus, I believed I could credibly represent a wide range of strong hands with a line of betting all three streets, that any medium strength hand of his couldn't call.
The key, I believe, is that the villain was a thinking player. It's difficult to represent a hand, or range of hands, if a villain isn't thinking about your cards in the first place.