Why are we getting paid if we bet instead? If anything checking makes it look less like a FD than betting.
^^^From my experience this is pretty much it.
So by not cebtting it and suddenly betting huge when the flush hits(whish is obviously a good card to rep),im prolly gonna get paid by all his aces. The bigger the bet he calls on turn if flush hits, the more chances there are that his hand is strong enough to call a maybe even close to pot sized river bets just cause i didnt cbet the FD.
99% of the time and esp at 5NL where play is rather straightforward. Aces and Flush draws are betting this flop. Also some air.
the thing is, if i (standard) cbet this flop i could get reraised and thrown off my hand.(either from a set that is trying to inflate pot and also from aces up and any Ax ,AK type hand). Not to mention the floats i get with KK,QQ,JJ,TT,77,66 and one pair type hands. If i then dont hit on turn but check behind and miss river, it will be almost impossible to get villain to fold unless i make a huge river bet and pray he folds.
I think this line is pretty good although i do understand why Blob and blocher arent great fans of the play. It's just a way to mix it up.
By raising pre and checking flop, we throw villain off and they have no clue as to where we are at. Also K high is good alot of the time here so they actually get a chance to turn their whole range into bluffs. when he almost pots turn ,hes actually doing the betting for us. When we are in position we are in total control and get to see what they do before acting if we miss and according to how the board runs out.
All in all, i check for pot control cause im not going for the Nut flush and also am not getting called by worse.
Of course alot of the time im betting as well, but i preffer checking in this spot to allow villain to make a mistake.