Don't.In PLO limping can be very profitable
So far no open limping however never say never
I been playing in extremely tight 6max games with lots of 2 and 3 bet folds
I think limping with KK or AA to open the pot might be a good play in this type of table
Don't.
You'll only have yourself to blame when someone hits a set and takes all your chips.
It seems like you are employing this strategy to all 500 NL live that you play? Limping EVERYTIME UTG and UTG+1 and any other later position with JJ+ is just so bad.No They really don't 3-bet a tight shortstacker very often marginal they really don't.... I could see open raising with aces in EP but I believe limping in and set mining or limp shoving is a strong way to play especially AK and JJ.
Oh and Yes we can get it in preflop with only ourselves 3 betting lol and if not your winning a raised pot with no contest an even better result particuarly with AK which is a fairly big part of the range...sometimes u may even get ur AK called by AQ or worse, other times ur shove might get someone else with AK or JJ too fold allowing us to win with the worst hand uncontested.... say we play ur standard poker... U raise to 3X with ur big pair UTG and everyone folds around to the guy on the button with pocket deuces, the player on the cut-off folds his KQ because afterall u raised UTG, and the guy on the button with 22 has an auto-call in position with plenty of odds to set-mine... I'd rather limp in with my A-A let the KQ raise get the deuces to call and maybe even get the 97 suited in the big blind to call the raise and then shove all in and pick up the 11 big blinds uncontested or have someone make a donko call where i'm huge fave...rather than go to the flop out of position up against piece of cheese hands looking to flop big and crack my MONSTER....
I also have a question about limping in but only regarding micro stakes.
Lets say you are playing 6max micro and you are on the CO with KTs. You have 2 calling stations limping in before you. The Btn and the SB are nits and the BB is a calling station. Wouldnt it be a better idea to just limp in than raise since you already know that they will probably cold call your raise and never fold their hand? They probably limp in with hands that are better than your KTs. The good thing is that you will still get good value from your hand when you hit big (straight or a flush), since the calling stations will call you down with top pair.
I would also like to add that i would raise my KTs if there were no limpers behind me, and i would probably fold it if there was a raise and a call before me.
thanx in advance
I think KTs in a premium hand in 6 max...as with all broadway cards...raise and isolate the limpers. most 6 max tables has been tight ....with 2 to the flop....that's a good hand to be playing heads up. if multiple callers still okay as you got position post flop.
The few instance that I might limp in is the AA situation when there is an agressive table and I know for sure there is going to be a raise after my limp so I can 3bet when it come s back to me......or when there is a loose passive table and I might play Axs ...not my favorite hand because of kicker problems if its not AK or AQ but i want as many players to see the flop cause I want to hit a flush draw and try to string someone like a KTs or other same suited cards along and trap himi agree about isolating the limpers, but the Btn and SB will probably fold anyway since they are nits. If they wake up with a premium hand or pair they will probably come in raising or 3betting my raise. the BB is also a calling station, and he will probably call anyway. Calling stations dont really fold when they decide to play and against their range i am not that ahead, so i dont feel like inflating the pot preflop. I also know that if i hit big i will get paid anyway, so why inflate the pot preflop? I hope i am making sense
Also include hands like QTs J10s T9s along with the KTs which was probably the wrong example to use.
Villian shoves 100% of pots with no raisers, he is directly to our left and we pick up a premium. There will always be spots where certain plays that are usually horrible are in fact optimal.
You can only play like this if your a super nit. What % of hand do you raise with?
very nit.
Shit, maybe I am a nit!
i'm saying 200$ buy in at 2-5 NL.......u limp with ur jacks and if no one raises u look for ur jack then u know ur golden.....plus u give the most opportunities for lesser hands than ur jacks tens nines eights lower pockets even,,, plus crappy overs and stuff KJ suited, KQ off KTsuited AToff or AJsuited etc. to raise then other less hands call in between comes back to u no one 3-bet the loose raiser u shove ur 200 bucks thats...bloooooop bankroll builder all day long
Im the OP and my question was posed to the cash games. In tournamnet play the increased blinds are such a signifigant factor that yes, I agree limping play can be the right play......depending on the situationnever say never!!!!
i think sometimes peeps are to regimented in their limp thinking ... nobody can argue the fact that if you are gonna play a hand, then play a hand, but sometimes you just get a feel or the structure of the tourney creates some ambiguity
i find that in tourneys you can get yourself pot comitted very quickly even when you have a stack that is say 15-20X the big blind, so you sometimes do have to ask yourself ... is this my tourney life hand or is this just one of those hands that i would love to see a cheap flop on or at least to see how people act in front of you
... or better yet, you can limp big and have a shorty shove with worse ... that is always a nice situation ... you know they are trying to find a pot that peeps seem to have little interest in to try to get their chips in
i mean, at the end of the day, poker is about figuring out what your opponent has and disguising what you have and a limp can sometimes do the latter, IMO
oh and just to take on the cash angle ... obviously when you have 100BBs why limp
never say never!!!!
i think sometimes peeps are to regimented in their limp thinking ... nobody can argue the fact that if you are gonna play a hand, then play a hand, but sometimes you just get a feel or the structure of the tourney creates some ambiguity
i find that in tourneys you can get yourself pot comitted very quickly even when you have a stack that is say 15-20X the big blind, so you sometimes do have to ask yourself ... is this my tourney life hand or is this just one of those hands that i would love to see a cheap flop on or at least to see how people act in front of you
... or better yet, you can limp big and have a shorty shove with worse ... that is always a nice situation ... you know they are trying to find a pot that peeps seem to have little interest in to try to get their chips in
i mean, at the end of the day, poker is about figuring out what your opponent has and disguising what you have and a limp can sometimes do the latter, IMO
oh and just to take on the cash angle ... obviously when you have 100BBs why limp
I do not know why people say to never limp in to open the pot. You have to stay random to avoid becoming predictable, there is a situation for everything. Absolutely refusing to use a weapon at your disposal is ignorant.