have to be nit to win at microstake?

[Ezekiel162]

It's good to hear you've got your confidence back. If anything, I believe most everyone here can agree that your thread's a success by just that alone.

gl

Yeah, I'll admit I've gotten some good tidbits here and there from member's explanations/suggestions on this thread myself. All in all, def not a waste of time either way...

 

[puke]

Yes. That is the goal for this thread. More and more people contributes and get every piece together, general or detail.

 

[NineLions]

Post some hands in the analysis section, or find someone in the forum who is willing to take 100-500 sequential hand histories of yours for review and comment. You're talking in way too general terms and it's going to take you forever to find the answer by just bantering general descriptions around.

The kind of people that can benefit from discussing styles and levels the way that you are doing here in this thread are the people that have already had hand reviews from others. It's going to take you forever if you skip that step.