Hey, ive come to the conclusion that when i made this thread, i must have been on some kind of tilt or bad beats in a row. Ive been playing alot of 5 NL the past few days and came to the conclusion that it is super easy after all.
I dont wanna brag(but i cant help myself), but i sat down for some 5NL zoom tonight and was playing as ABC as it gets and i was on some kind of crazy heater and i made my initial 5$ into 38 during one session. thats almost 8 buy ins in 2 hours of double tabling zoom.
After that im never gonna say that 5NL is hard again. Long live 5NL!!
Everything is easy when on a heater I can't play Zoom profitably though, so if you can go for it!
I have followed some recent advice from the forum and just stopped thinking while playing. Started crushing 15 bb/100 while running 5bb/100 under EV (of course) over 4k hands.... we will see if it lasts.
Hey, ive come to the conclusion that when i made this thread, i must have been on some kind of tilt or bad beats in a row. Ive been playing alot of 5 NL the past few days and came to the conclusion that it is super easy after all.
I dont wanna brag(but i cant help myself), but i sat down for some 5NL zoom tonight and was playing as ABC as it gets and i was on some kind of crazy heater and i made my initial 5$ into 38 during one session. thats almost 8 buy ins in 2 hours of double tabling zoom.
After that im never gonna say that 5NL is hard again. Long live 5NL!!
Surprise. You mean all those experienced players who told you that in this topic may actually know what they're talking about after all eh. Imagine that.
Obviously shoving a hand that is between 18% and 55% in equity is teh nuts.
Hand 2, same guy, I bought in with cash this time and won some $$$:
MP2 ($5.54)
CO ($8.63)
Button ($2.11)
Hero (SB) ($9.28)
BB ($4.88)
UTG ($13.03)
UTG+1 ($1.47)
MP1 ($9.76)
Preflop: Hero is SB with K
, K
4 folds, CO bets $0.15, 1 fold, Hero raises to $0.45, 1 fold, CO calls $0.30
Flop: ($0.95) 10
, 7
, 3
(2 players) Hero bets $0.95, CO calls $0.95
Turn: ($2.85) Q
(2 players) Hero bets $2.13, CO calls $2.13 - Sizing doesn't matter really (I could have potted and he calls anyway), we are getting it in on the river 100% of the time.
River: ($7.11) 6
(2 players) Hero bets $5.75 (All-In), CO calls $5.10 (All-In)
Total pot: $17.31 | Rake: $0.86
Results below:
Hero had K
, K
(one pair, Kings).
CO had 7
, 6
(two pair, sevens and sixes).
Outcome: CO won $16.45
... 89k hands and counting. It just never stops, ever.
He is now sitting with 4BI and is in God mode, shoving pretty much every hand with any kind of equity (22, hey, lets shove!).
I am seriously mentally exhausted from all this endless shit, no matter how much I try I am ALWAYS running into this garbage.
You don't get it. If you shove 22 best you can hope for is 55% (unless I am completely retarded and am somehow calling with A2 or something) and any other PP has you utterly crushed. It is just not done.
So it is not that I lost a flip but he had to know he is making on average a massively -EV play.
Hand 3, same guy. He calmed down a bit after coolering me last time, now he is raising normal hands. Even cretins get some self-preservation instincts after narrow escapes. Stopped shoving every 3rd hand too.
MP1 ($4.78)
MP2 ($20.43)
MP3 ($3.25)
Hero (CO) ($5.88) - Gotta build up that stack so I can take on the champ
Button ($3.21)
SB ($5.39)
BB ($1.15)
UTG ($1.99)
UTG+1 ($2.64)
The guy has completely shut down, VPIP went from like 70 to 0 I am guessing he is waiting for AA or something and then he is gonna show me who is the boss I bet he slowplays it too.
You probably hope for a fold heh as opposed to 55%. 55 is a little generous actually. 83o would get him over 54, but I'm not sure what you're calling a jam with that he'd get 55% against.
Yeah I hate when my opponents make massively -EV plays too. Given what I think I know about your 3bet/f4bet/general play etc, jamming over your reraise with that hand was suicidal. 5NL gonna 5NL.
One of my opponents just told me he runs bad but not as bad as I do
"vicki_g95: I've seen you get some bad luck damacon
damacon77: yeah, it is getting tiresome
vicki_g95: lol dw you can't be as bad as me
damacon77: you think so?
vicki_g95: ok lol maybe you can
vicki_g95: my PT4 shows you running $29 below EV
vicki_g95: I'm $26 below
damacon77: I am 35 "
I make people feel better about themselves "well at least I am not that guy"
Playing some 5NL myself atm. Looks like min 3 betting random junk oop is still a thing. It's not tetris guys. You don't lose when your stack gets too high.
The main reason the micro limits are so hard to beat is the astronomical rake. From my experience at 6-max 100NL the rake equates to about 5 or 6 bb/100. At 2NL or 5NL I can imagine this number is much closer to 10bb/100 or even more. This means you must be beating the game at a least 10bb/100 just to break even!
Luckily, as you move up limits you end up paying less and less rake because on all sites the rake cap is in $ and not big blinds. I would avoid 2NL and 5NL and stick to 10NL and above as long as you have enough bankroll.
According to HEM (which isn't entirely correct) rake in 5NL comes to 5.7 bb/100 and I am aware it is eating into everybody's win rate. It is not accidental that even the best winners I see are barely above break even when EV adjusted (most winners are running above EV).
I am now at around 440$ and could take some shots at 10NL but the rake is calculated in the same % there (only at 25NL it drops down a bit). Also I feel that I am simply not good enough yet to go up since there are situations that I handle badly (mostly blinds play and OOP play in general). If my losses can be somewhat attributed to putrid runbad, OK, but who says it won't be even worse higher up where players are better.
I want to at least break even in 5NL (now at -86$, of which 33$ are pure EV minus and the rest is runbad + mistakes) before I move up if BR allows and ideally I would like to have at least 50k hands sample where I am winning comfortably after EV adjustment.
Considering the number of mistakes I am making it should be doable, after all I am now at only -0,75 bb/100 (EV adjusted) and I am running horribly.
Thank you for the correct and helpful suggestion though.
According to HEM (which isn't entirely correct) rake in 5NL comes to 5.7 bb/100, and I am aware it is eating into everybody's win rate. It is not accidental that even the best winners I see are barely above break even when EV adjusted (most winners are running above EV).
I am now at around 440$ and could take some shots at 10NL but the rake is calculated in the same % there (only at 25NL it drops down a bit). Also I feel that I am simply not good enough yet to go up since there are situations that I handle badly (mostly blinds play and OOP play in general). If my losses can be somewhat attributed to putrid runbad, OK, but what says it won't be even worse higher up where players are better.
I want to at least break even in 5NL (now at -86$, of which 33$ are pure EV minus and the rest is runbad + mistakes) before I move up if BR allows and ideally I would like to have at least 50k hands sample where I am winning comfortably after EV adjustment. Considering the number of mistakes I am making it should be doable.
FullTilt doesn't even have the lowest rake rates either. Fairly sure stars sits at the lowest on the scale. All the other sites tend to have more rake no matter the limit, however micro rake on the less popular sites can be extremely high in comparison. Thankfully they make up for it with worse competition.