rifflemao
Pugs Not Drugs
Silver Level
some of us have balls, some of us have brains and some players have both!
That took guts.
some of us have balls, some of us have brains and some players have both!
But they comments are knoledge filled why woulf u want less knoledge in a game that reqhires a lot of knoledgw?! ...,
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I537 using Tapatalk 2
BB has to decide whether to call based on is evaluation of what Hero's range is, not on his actual AJ holding. Other considerations can factor into the decision as well; e.g. how steep or flat the prize structure is, whether BB is in a situation that is common or unusual for him, etc.interesting discussion...How is this situation.. Down to 7 folks in 6-max Super turbo with 6 ITM and 2 of them are short stack (2 or 3 BB). in theHero is 3rd (8 BB) in stack has AJo in in the Button. Big stack is in the BB with 14BB .. Hero Shoves..SB folds... How wide should the BB call?
well said. I completely agreePersonally, I feel that bubble play depends on your stack size. For example, being a middle stack on the bubble as your friend was, I wouldn't have made that call solely because of negative variance. Even though it was a correct call based on a good read, he still only wins 60% there against a random hand. And if he's wrong or dominated he becomes the bubble boy most of the time. According to the Independent Chip Model, a call in that spot creates negative EV long term.
He could have sat and folded around letting one of the short stacks get blinded out or force them to gamble to become a mid stack.
I think there are only two times where playing mid level hands on the bubble is ok: 1. If you are the chip leader and taking advantage of tight bubble play 2. If you are the short stock and must pick a spot to get back in it.
This is just my personal opinion based on watching numerous people make the same move to get sucked out on and eliminated on the bubble when they could have let someone else take the fall to create a profit. I understand scared money doesn't make money, but negative EV is a reality and in the long term those plays will lose him money PERIOD. Scared or not.
Personally, I feel that bubble play depends on your stack size. For example, being a middle stack on the bubble as your friend was, I wouldn't have made that call solely because of negative variance. Even though it was a correct call based on a good read, he still only wins 60% there against a random hand. And if he's wrong or dominated he becomes the bubble boy most of the time. According to the Independent Chip Model, a call in that spot creates negative EV long term.
He could have sat and folded around letting one of the short stacks get blinded out or force them to gamble to become a mid stack.
I think there are only two times where playing mid level hands on the bubble is ok: 1. If you are the chip leader and taking advantage of tight bubble play 2. If you are the short stock and must pick a spot to get back in it.
This is just my personal opinion based on watching numerous people make the same move to get sucked out on and eliminated on the bubble when they could have let someone else take the fall to create a profit. I understand scared money doesn't make money, but negative EV is a reality and in the long term those plays will lose him money PERIOD. Scared or not.