If the mincash was the exact amount you owed to the mob and the deadline was tomorrow
Ey calm down Jimmy, I told you I'd get you the money alright?? :dontknow:
I may not be able to outplay Phil Ivey or call down a bluff with jack high, but at least I can make the right decision and simply call/shove with AA <10 bb's.
I'd donate to Phil just for the experience, and I've added a 'player note' so don't be surprised if you catch me
bluffing hard against you with
high :rofl:
I don't like the AA AI
call here (even with
guaranteed edge) due to 2 factors: the bubble,
and we are OOP. How does position have anything to do with all-in, right? If I shove into BB with AA and he calls, it's most likely because he thinks I'm bluffing or he has a 'decent heads-up hand' (lower end of his range). We're late in the tourney, so he's a strong player (or slight chance of a luckbox :joyman: ) that will assume you're shoving to blind steal because you're <10BB, thus pinning you on the lower end of your range and falling into your trap. If someone in early-mid position who is not short-stacked shoves, they're most likely not bluffing and have a very strong hand... I'd much rather face a mediocre hand with AA
on my terms than bubble on a bad beat vs a lower PP (much higher probability)
“ When you hunt, let the game come to you. ”
" If you are the anvil, be patient. If you are the hammer; strike. ”
“ When you compromise, you lose. When you seem to have compromise, you have taken a step towards winning. ”
I can buy in at least at $5NL comfortably.
OK, I was just kidding when I said I'd bluff
high against you... I can't even afford a seat at your table.
OP is looking for validation for his decision, but sometimes there is no way to sugarcoat it.
I got validation that I made the correct decision when my graph moved upwards as I cashed for
more than min
“ After a victory, sharpen your knife. ”
I'm looking for other's POV so I can improve future decision-making (you might mention factors I hadn't considered) and I appreciate you (and everyone else who posted and disagrees with me) sharing criticism! No sugarcoating necessary, I actually enjoy the forthrightness. :icon_thum
“ Good medicine is always bitter. ”
I came from freeroll money and making those calls led to me busting and I suppose that delayed building a playable bankroll. But only if you take a short-term view of things. In reality they were mathematically correct calls and thus were profitable
...
On the contrary to your concern, you're throwing away money by folding.
...
keep the eye on the long view.
...
If you bubble, shrug it off.
If I bubble and miss the money, there is no bankroll and thus no long-term to be considered. I will admit I see your point, and you guys almost had me convinced... Today on a new site I bubbled due to a mathematically correct call :argh: If you judge yourself by how well you play 'perfect poker' ('textbook poker', 'ABC poker', or whatever you want to call it) that's one thing... I'll be over here judging my success by my profits (IE: how any 'regular' non-poker-player would judge you as a 'poker player') and playing accordingly :deal:
I've got to go back to the Ungar example mentioned previously one more time lol...
Celina said:
Matloubi's play here is effective and will work possibly 90% of the time or more, except that this time he came across a worthy opponent.
Both players made the right decision but one ended up $50,000 richer. For once it wasn't variance that decided the outcome: Stuey was able to rationalize everything covered in this thread so far (and more!) so perfectly that he calls the all-in shove in only
a few seconds while holding 10 high!
Not only that, he says "You've either got 4-5 or 5-6, I call." and is 100% accurate in reading his opponent's 54o! This is why I am here having this discussion with you, so that we can grasp a concept so much deeper than anything we have read before.
“ Fortune is on the side of the strong. ”