I've noticed that most rec-players are lucky because they aren't trying to win, necessarily, w/an, ahem,
poker strategy. They've got more $ than brains/poker-sense and they're just passing the time. I mean who can blame them, right?
Most of the rec-players I come in contact with are more of the
gambling type anyway, so they just want to see a flop. I have to pick my spots a little better, look for
tells and betting patterns a little closer. Plus, they're more likely to play their f
avorite hand. These usually consist of the odd but "I get it" starting hand combos like 10-4 and J5 and 8-3 and 6-2, suited it seems but still raising utg w/this crap? You betcha they will.
Have you ever noticed that the better hands suffer the worst beats by lesser hands? Why is it that we haven't noticed that it's these crap hands that are beating the better starting hands? In other words, embrace the crap hands. I know it's hard to do but to beat a donkey you have to think like a donkey. I have to believe that there is some logic to that.
Long ago I performed an experiment on PS's. They had a 360 plyr sng/trny for $.10, or as I nicknamed it "the Dime 360". It was a fun little trny, especially if you were down on funds or just felt like donking around, like I did on that day. Anyway, I made my mind up that whenever I had at least a J or better that I would shove all-in, no matter my position or stack size. J2-AA was my range. I made it to the ft the first time and went out in 2nd or 3rd. The next time I won. I did it again like 3 more times and "cashed" in all of them. I wouldn't dream of doing that in a real trny but then again, I understand bankroll management and check-raises and floats etc.
So beating a rec-player may take a little more patience than normal but then there lies another, so-called, poker challenge. It can only be good for our game, in theory. Agree?