All good points.
I have an issue with the BRM 'rules' you espouse. Not that they are wrong, they are not wrong. Rather that they might be nitty. But everyone should understand them.
There are folks in the world who enjoy the game as entertainment more than as some badge of honor. For those who can afford it, a night of OLP (
online poker) is as much fun as a night out drinking and dancing. They are willing to drop $50 on such a night. They mostly understand they will wake up the next day with little more than a hangover and memories. Maybe they got lucky and wake up the next morning to a new mate or a
bankroll.
In either case, they will want a guide on how to tend to that newly found lucky win. Well, we generally don't offer love advise around here, but we can offer BRM advise, and so the formula you offer is not bad. Like I said, perhaps a bit nitty. It was born mostly during the heady days of unfettered poker growth, between Moneymaker and Black Friday. It was born by 2 distinct groups, the FRW's, and the (generally) bad players who got caught up in the headiness of the game, and found themselves depositing several times a day, and losing fast.
Everybody involved saw that personal responsibility was necessary. No one wanted anyone to experience personal ruin. Chris Ferguson created, no,
formalized, the BRM concept with his $1-$10K challenge. It took him a long time, over a year. And he had (has?) talent. But he was successful in spreading the concepts of BRM and personal responsibility.
Meanwhile, there are players out there with money and ease of deposit, who just want something to do tonight. They don't really need BRM.
What every player should understand is where they fit in the grand scheme of things. Do they 'need' to be somewhat frugal? If yes, then they 'need' BRM to be an important part of their game. If no, then WE need to welcome them.