Ultranit
I still prefer raising AA. The object is to get as much money in the pot ASAP PREFLOP with AA. More money you can get in the pot preflop, the easier it is to get your whole stack in the middle with AA post flop. (Stack to Pot Ratio : SPR)
Limping AA just sounds ultra nitty if you're playing scared money post flop.
I hear what you are saying but it doesn't usually work that way. If you are open shoving you are guaranteed to be facing maybe only one player to the flop. That play seems ultra donkish btw. Mind you we are talking in early position with AA...I'm not talking in position against other players.
Let me use your SPR explanation to further clarify:
You are UTG and you limp..blinds are 75/150...you have the starting 20k stack ...5 people see a flop...Pot is 750....
You raise UTG 3 x (450) and get 3 callers ...Pot is 1800....
What is your continuation bet post flop on both?
I would argue that both have potentially disastrous consequences early in the tournament. I would argue that both scenarios each player probably has the same hand. How do you navigate? When you limp, no one knows your hand. I was taught to ask with your chips. I think it is more likely that someone in late position will look to pick up dead money with a nice raise when you limp early in a tournament ....more often than when you 3x early and have callers. If JJ+ and AK/AQ are on the button or behind you...you will get raised whether you limp or you raise.
If I raise in LP with AK, AQ, JJ, QQ...and the guy that limped reraises me...I am not immediately putting him on AA.....if he 3x's...and he reraises me, KK/AA has to be in your wheelhouse!
PS. I am in no way trying to convince everyone that you should adopt this. I'm just trying to broaden your thinking.
Secondly, I have never been called a nit...so I doubt this is an ultra nit play
Sil3ntness, I would love to know how much you have earned in tournament play. You can PM me if you'd like