What you guys think which tourneys are more profitable? Bounty tournaments are probably better for ROI because you don't need to reach ITM to get some money back but in regular tournaments its less risky and better chances to get deeper because less players will you call you off. So in overall, whats better?
The question doesn't really make sense.
Profitable for whom?
The house is always profitable.
A $0.50 game is more profitable than a $1000 game if you make it into the money in the former and not the latter.
The question you should be asking yourself is:
What are my poker strengths and where are these most valuable?
For example, if you are a no fear, call any shove kinda person, Deep stacked tourneys are not for you. I'd say go for SpinNGo, single table SNGs, Grand Tour / Neymar KO.
If you are tight as a drum with no wavering...stick to cash games.
TAG -- deep stack tourneys.
But of course there is much more to it than this,
Are you exploitative? Find the games/tables with such exploitable natures.
But the notion that one tourney is so inherently more profitable that you can ask a non-specific poker population what it is -- is more hopeful than realistic.
So -- the subtext of your question becomes: how can I become more profitable in my poker play?
The answer to that is to know what your leaks and exploitable weaknesses are.
That requires reviewing your
hands. Taking a statistical view of where you make money for each game type you make, and where you lose.
Sometimes the losses are bad beats, so you can reduce their relevance...but if you notice you are losing big in hands where you raise from UTG, you might consider tightening your range from early position.
In the end, all games are profitable to those with an edge for the game they're playing.
Cheers,
ObbleeXY