trips vs bad player

[Dingodaddy23]

pokerstars Game #6811944492: Tournament #34696510, $4.00+$0.40 Hold'em No Limit - Level I (10/20) - 2006/10/29 - 02:38:43 (ET)
Table '34696510 18' 9-max Seat #9 is the button
Seat 1: mj23lbj111 (1480 in chips)
Seat 2: Avida2005 (2200 in chips)
Seat 3: junewagers (1160 in chips)
Seat 4: highrola247 (870 in chips)
Seat 5: Samad (1470 in chips) is sitting out
Seat 6: tnkspe119 (2490 in chips)
Seat 7: martiankid (1430 in chips)
Seat 8: pauly9214 (1810 in chips)
Seat 9: slavonija (2060 in chips)
mj23lbj111: posts small blind 10
Avida2005: posts big blind 20
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to mj23lbj111 [9h 6c]
junewagers: folds
highrola247: folds
Samad: folds
tnkspe119: folds
martiankid: folds
pauly9214: calls 20
slavonija: calls 20
mj23lbj111: calls 10
Avida2005: checks
*** FLOP *** [6h 6s Ks]
mj23lbj111: checks
Avida2005: checks
pauly9214: checks
slavonija: bets 60
mj23lbj111: raises 165 to 225
Avida2005: folds
pauly9214: folds
slavonija: calls 165
*** TURN *** [6h 6s Ks] [8h]
mj23lbj111: bets 400
slavonija: raises 1415 to 1815 and is all-in

.......

what do you put him on and whats your move?

 

[Effexor]

I'd call. What hands can beat you? Pocket kings, 8's or a bigger 6. The kings are unlikely as he'd raise PF. If he had one of the other hands, well thats poker. I'm guessing he had Kx.

 

[shinedown.45]

PokerStars Game #6811944492: Tournament #34696510, $4.00+$0.40 Hold'em No Limit - Level I (10/20) - 2006/10/29 - 02:38:43 (ET)
Table '34696510 18' 9-max Seat #9 is the button
Seat 1: mj23lbj111 (1480 in chips)
Seat 2: Avida2005 (2200 in chips)
Seat 3: junewagers (1160 in chips)
Seat 4: highrola247 (870 in chips)
Seat 5: Samad (1470 in chips) is sitting out
Seat 6: tnkspe119 (2490 in chips)
Seat 7: martiankid (1430 in chips)
Seat 8: pauly9214 (1810 in chips)
Seat 9: slavonija (2060 in chips)
mj23lbj111: posts small blind 10
Avida2005: posts big blind 20
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to mj23lbj111 [9h 6c]
junewagers: folds
highrola247: folds
Samad: folds
tnkspe119: folds
martiankid: folds
pauly9214: calls 20
slavonija: calls 20
mj23lbj111: calls 10
Avida2005: checks
*** FLOP *** [6h 6s Ks]
mj23lbj111: checks
Avida2005: checks
pauly9214: checks
slavonija: bets 60
mj23lbj111: raises 165 to 225
Avida2005: folds
pauly9214: folds
slavonija: calls 165
*** TURN *** [6h 6s Ks] 8♥
mj23lbj111: bets 400
slavonija: raises 1415 to 1815 and is all-in

.......

what do you put him on and whats your move?

I only quote you b/c it's easier to scroll over the hand, with that said:
What are you doing in the hand?, and if you say SB, thats weak.
If I had been in the hand I would have put him on K-8 and called his bet and find out that he didn't raise his pocket 8s PF and I would have been out of the tourney, but as a pokerstars player myself the best hand he would have held would have to be the K-8, so again push allin.........and again I have to ask......What were you doing in the hand in the first place?!!!!
I don't mean to sound harsh or like an expert, but after being at this forum for awhile I do know that you dont hold onto garbage like 9-6os and I'm sure alot of others will ask the same Question. Yeah sure 69 looks inviting , but that's between you and the wife/girlfriend/other, but at the poker table it's a no-no.

 

[Bombjack]

I only quote you b/c it's easier to scroll over the hand, with that said:
What are you doing in the hand?, and if you say SB, thats weak.
If I had been in the hand I would have put him on K-8 and called his bet and find out that he didn't raise his pocket 8s PF and I would have been out of the tourney, but as a pokerstars player myself the best hand he would have held would have to be the K-8, so again push allin.........and again I have to ask......What were you doing in the hand in the first place?!!!!
I don't mean to sound harsh or like an expert, but after being at this forum for awhile I do know that you dont hold onto garbage like 9-6os and I'm sure alot of others will ask the same Question. Yeah sure 69 looks inviting , but that's between you and the wife/girlfriend/other, but at the poker table it's a no-no.

One word: Implied odds.

(That's 2 words. Doh!)

 

[ChuckTs]

I only quote you b/c it's easier to scroll over the hand, with that said:
What are you doing in the hand?, and if you say SB, thats weak.
If I had been in the hand I would have put him on K-8 and called his bet and find out that he didn't raise his pocket 8s PF and I would have been out of the tourney, but as a pokerstars player myself the best hand he would have held would have to be the K-8, so again push allin.........and again I have to ask......What were you doing in the hand in the first place?!!!!
I don't mean to sound harsh or like an expert, but after being at this forum for awhile I do know that you dont hold onto garbage like 9-6os and I'm sure alot of others will ask the same Question. Yeah sure 69 looks inviting , but that's between you and the wife/girlfriend/other, but at the poker table it's a no-no.

He's getting 7:1 on his call, which in itself is plenty. Add on the (massive) implied odds - as Bombjack mentioned - and the call is fine.

Some people employ a super tight, premium hands only style in the first hour, and others use a limp to see a flop style. Your implied odds in the 4.40s are HUGE because people will put their entire stack in the middle with top pair any kicker with no hesitation if you happen to hit trips or a hidden two pair.

 

[shinedown.45]

One word: Implied odds.

(That's 2 words. Doh!)

your right, and thats one of a few areas of my game I'm still working on.

 

[shinedown.45]

He's getting 7:1 on his call, which in itself is plenty. Add on the (massive) implied odds - as Bombjack mentioned - and the call is fine.

Some people employ a super tight, premium hands only style in the first hour, and others use a limp to see a flop style. Your implied odds in the 4.40s are HUGE because people will put their entire stack in the middle with top pair any kicker with no hesitation if you happen to hit trips or a hidden two pair.

my appologies to Dingo, please forgive me Daddy(lol). as it goes for implied odds and such, looks like more reading is required by me.
Thanks Chuck and Jack for pointing this out for me.
I'm even learning from someone elses threads/posts

 

[ChuckTs]

my appologies to Dingo, please forgive me Daddy(lol). as it goes for implied odds and such, looks like more reading is required by me.
Thanks Chuck and Jack for pointing this out for me.
I'm even learning from someone elses threads/posts

https://www.cardschat.com/poker-odds-pot-odds-implied-odds.php



It's really a simple concept; if you understand pot odds, then implied odds should come easy for you.

 

[loopmeister]

I put villian on Kx. If she has K6, then oh well.

 

[Dingodaddy23]

villian had A6

gg me

the more i think about it I think i was right, my 9 kicker was beating any 76, 56, 46, 86 that opponet may have limped with, i don't think this guy would have got away from trip 6's with any kicker. so oh well, chalk it up