Did I make the right bets at the right times?

[shinedown.45]

very early on so no reads as of yet, but made a few reads after this hand was over:

pokerstars Game #7310280273: Tournament #37162486, $1.00+$0.10 Hold'em No Limit - Level I (10/20) - 2006/12/05 - 11:14:15 (ET)
Table '37162486 95' 9-max Seat #7 is the button
Seat 1: Hobnobs (1910 in chips)
Seat 2: t-roo (1360 in chips)
Seat 3: jmccar01 (2430 in chips)
Seat 4: cdsplace (1600 in chips)
Seat 5: JoeyD40 (2330 in chips)
Seat 6: SickStack99 (1530 in chips)
Seat 7: mollyshan (4920 in chips)
Seat 8: reglardave (560 in chips)
Seat 9: Orion469 (1650 in chips)
reglardave: posts small blind 10
Orion469: posts big blind 20
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to Orion469 [3d 3c]
Hobnobs: folds
t-roo: calls 20
jmccar01: calls 20
cdsplace: folds
JoeyD40: calls 20
SickStack99: folds
mollyshan: calls 20
reglardave: calls 10
Orion469: checks
*** FLOP *** [Kh 3h 5h]
reglardave: checks
Orion469: bets 100
t-roo: calls 100
jmccar01: calls 100
JoeyD40: folds
mollyshan: folds
reglardave: folds
*** TURN *** [Kh 3h 5h] [5d]
Orion469: bets 300
t-roo: calls 300
jmccar01: calls 300
*** RIVER *** [Kh 3h 5h 5d] [Ad]
Orion469: bets 600
t-roo: folds
jmccar01: calls 600
*** SHOW DOWN ***
Orion469: shows [3d 3c] (a full house, Threes full of Fives)
jmccar01: mucks hand
Orion469 collected 2520 from pot

 

[Beriac]

Yes:

- The check from the BB at the beginning is perfect with a multi-way pot and a low pocket pair.
- You've got 6 players to the flop, and hit low set on a board with 3 hearts. Now, let's do the math that a random person has 2 hearts given that there are 3 showing already: 10/47 * 9/46 = ~4% per person. Maybe slightly higher if we assume that people like to play suited cards, but let's say 4%. You have 5 villains, so in theory there's about a 20% chance that you're in against a flush. Even then, you have multiple outs against a flush: 3 Ks, 3 5s, and 1 3, or 7 outs. To me, I think I'm ahead until I'm told otherwise at this point, so I value bet about the pot, which you did.
- On the turn, the 5 doesn't scare me too much. Who's calling a pot-sized bet with second pair on the flop on a scary flush board? Hopefully no one. So value-bet the pot again.
- River is as the turn, and you extracted some more value from people who were clearly willing to call.

I wouldn't have done it any differently, I think.

 

[gord962]

what did jmccar01 muck?? I'm curious if he was on K-rag.

 

[shinedown.45]

what did jmccar01 muck?? I'm curious if he was on K-rag.

didn't show his hand, but after the hand I put him on K-x off with one being a heart.

 

[blankoblanco]

? if he called the river, you should have been able to see what he mucked in the history, no?

 

[shinedown.45]

? if he called the river, you should have been able to see what he mucked in the history, no?

At PS you have the option to muck a losing hand.

 

[t1riel]

Honestly, I would have bet more on the flop. You only bet roughly the pot so you're giving players odds to call and chase the flush. Granted, by the turn it didn't matter but you don't want players outdrawing you if that 5 didn't come up. Nice pot!

 

[tenbob]

At PS you have the option to muck a losing hand.

You can still get mucked hands from the HH summary. Played it prefectly IMO.