One more perspective so that someone can finally post about how all the mods are just agreeing with each other just because. I'm sure my opinion on this doesn't matter much, but that's never stopped me before.
FWIW in the future, simply posting it in the HA forum does not mean it was meant to be or even should be here. Anyway, my reason for adding to this post is a vaguely realistic hope that it might actually serve as an example of the kind of logic we use when making these decisions (which are nothing more than judgement calls based on what we see at the time).
Here are the indicators in the post that would have made me think this was a bad beat/vent thread:
1.
Sounds like a vent...
2.
I snapped on villain after this, i usually dont do this but i really wanted to do well in this
tells how he over-reacted and looks to justify it.
3.
i knew i was WAY ahead of him.
Clearly knows that he should have won the hand and lost to a suckout.
4.
*** FLOP *** [3h 4c Ts]
pitter22: bets 550
wezo qc: raises 550 to 1100
pitter22: raises 385 to 1485 and is all-in
wezo qc: calls 20 and is all-in
Uncalled bet (365) returned to pitter22
*** TURN *** [3h 4c Ts] [Tc]
*** RIVER *** [3h 4c Ts Tc] A♥
*** SHOW DOWN ***
pitter22: shows [Js Jc] (two pair, Jacks and Tens)
wezo qc: shows [Ac Kh] (two pair, Aces and Tens)
wezo qc collected 3140 from pot
Posts results where all the money went in on the flop and shows how he waited for two streets and then variance happened.
5. Didn't post any reads or thoughts on the hand or what villian might be doing.
6. Didn't actually ask any questions or specify where input might be necessary such as was the whole hand a cluster **** or was it on the flop play where he wasn't sure how to play an overpair to the flop, etc.
In contrast, here are the indicators in the post that would have made me think this was a hand analysis thread:
1.
See the difference? Oh well, I tried. Please continue your analysis on how quickly to shove here because as played no one is folding there.