All In Decision!

F Paulsson

F Paulsson

euro love
Silver Level
Joined
Aug 24, 2005
Total posts
5,799
Awards
1
Chips
1
Of the rest of the possible hands, AKs, AKo, AQs, and the other KK, are coinflips.... they could go either way.
That's a weird looking coin, in that case. ;)

KK is > 2:1 favorite over any A-x hand that isn't specifically AA.
 
Lana_Faith

Lana_Faith

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Mar 1, 2007
Total posts
190
Chips
0
That's a weird looking coin, in that case. ;)

KK is > 2:1 favorite over any A-x hand that isn't specifically AA.

It IS a wierd looking coin because we're not facing one villain but two. Assuming both have at least one A, which I think is a fair assumption, the coin has three sides, and therefore this is NOT 2:1 odds...
 
F Paulsson

F Paulsson

euro love
Silver Level
Joined
Aug 24, 2005
Total posts
5,799
Awards
1
Chips
1
It IS a wierd looking coin because we're not facing one villain but two. Assuming both have at least one A, which I think is a fair assumption, the coin has three sides, and therefore this is NOT 2:1 odds...
No, in that case we're 4:1 (80%) to win, not 2:1 (67%), unless one of them has specifically AA.

Edit: Actually, no, we're still just about 2:1. I checked with PokerStove, and we've gone up from 67% to win to just above 70%.
 
Lana_Faith

Lana_Faith

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Mar 1, 2007
Total posts
190
Chips
0
Duh I just thought about what I said and of course you're right... in this specific case, any overcard would have to be the A, which means that with two A's in play, they're drawing semi-dead to one another.

I bow to your superior intellect, good sir knight.

However, I do think my base argument has some validity. I think many times players, even GOOD players will memorize statistics like you just quoted, but forget that the odds change, and sometimes drastically when faced with a three-way or more-way pot.

Anyhow, yes you're right and I'm wrong on this one.
 
B

baystate123

Enthusiast
Silver Level
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Total posts
62
Chips
0
"Call" with a capital C. You're not a favorite to win against 2 others both comming over the top like that. But to reiterate, the money commands it. Personally, the only time I'd consider folding would be if I was right on the bubble and I do see at least 1 other player in the tourney that I had 2-1 in chips there. Even then I'd call 80% of the time.
 
R

rivertapped

Enthusiast
Silver Level
Joined
Mar 2, 2007
Total posts
55
Chips
0
You've got such a short stack I suppose you call. If you were a large stack and one of the others had you covered, maybe you could fold.

In this situation tho, call and hope to win the thing. I don't like folding here and trying to sneak into the money for a small cash.
 
Welly

Welly

Visionary
Silver Level
Joined
Jul 7, 2006
Total posts
760
Chips
0
It obviously goes without saying what you should do. However here is something more interesting to ponder...

A) Would you call if you knew the opponents both had AA ?

B) Would you call if 'Scan Rautli' had also entered the pot and you knew he had 22?

(NB take into account cash vs tournament play)
 
Lana_Faith

Lana_Faith

Rock Star
Silver Level
Joined
Mar 1, 2007
Total posts
190
Chips
0
A) Would you call if you knew the opponents both had AA ?

Absolutely. At that point there's no chance for them to better their hand, whereas I have 5 cards coming, any one of which might be that killer third K.
 
F Paulsson

F Paulsson

euro love
Silver Level
Joined
Aug 24, 2005
Total posts
5,799
Awards
1
Chips
1
Pot's just a wee bit too small to justify calling, even if we know they both have AA. If we had them all covered, it would be just about break-even, but I think KKvAAvAA is ~20% to win, and we're not quite getting 4:1 pot odds.
 
p215j

p215j

Enthusiast
Silver Level
Joined
Feb 15, 2007
Total posts
34
Chips
0
Hmm, interesting scenario.

IMHO you can either call here or simply stop playing poker. Period.
 
Top