Obviously he crushes live poker.This whole thread is a joke right? Maybe intended to increase your post count to earn platinum status? Although its not exactly "quality posts", so that might not work. For anyone taking this remotely serious, please take a moment to check out OPs Sharkscope profile on PokerStars (username found in CC profile).
SharkScope - Online and Live Poker Statistics
Track your poker statistics and avoid the sharks. SharkScope is the most complete database of poker tournament results available and covers virtually all online poker sites.www.sharkscope.com
OP started playing on PokerStars around 3 weeks ago. He has since then played 335 games for an average buyin of $0,09 playing mainly freerolls and hyperturbo satellites. So yeah. Clearly someone, who has a lot of experience, and whos opinion should carry a lot of weight
Since he already mentioned phil hellmuth as his hero (who could probably not even beat cardschat freerolls online) i think its safe to say that OP is from a live background.Obviously he crushes live poker.
And those who win tournaments think that it is twisted in their direction.They found a way to cheat, maybe it doesn't happen to you because you are a regular customer, but it happens to me every day. I lose tournaments magically.
Or merged into the rigged megathread. I guess, this is, what it was created for?I think all rigged threads should be deleted with not further notice or explanation.
That is for the SnG leaderboard though. For MTTs the upside potential is significantly larger. But those topping the leaderboard a single year will also tend to be some, who ran hot and binked a big score. The Sharkscope leaderboards, which is a brand new feature, are definitely usefull and worth spending some time to study. The guy topping the SnG leaderboard for 2023 is a heads-up player on PokerStars. And unless you hate money, you probably want to stay out of his wayThe top player on the Sharkscope leaderboards has averaged $2 of profit per game played. Many others top players are at $1 or lower. Let that sink in, in terms of what kind of game you are playing.
Yeah, maybe some people cant believe this, but the action in pokerstars is ridiculous, encourage you to bet with strong hands against unbeatable hands, or you loose proflop againts a magical straight or color.Unfortunately, we will never know the truth about RNG at pokerstars!
I would love to see the average of the top MTT players as well. I have a feeling it isn't much better - on average - over their entire playing history, unless like you say someone binked a few big ones early on, which wouldn't be much different from being a lottery winner.That is for the SnG leaderboard though. For MTTs the upside potential is significantly larger. But those topping the leaderboard a single year will also tend to be some, who ran hot and binked a big score. The Sharkscope leaderboards, which is a brand new feature, are definitely usefull and worth spending some time to study. The guy topping the SnG leaderboard for 2023 is a heads-up player on PokerStars. And unless you hate money, you probably want to stay out of his way
The average duration someone spends in an MTT is much less than the time, it lasts. After two hours at least half the field is gone, so even if the tournament lasts for 11 hours (like some of the biggest events), the average time spend by a player is much less than that. And in top of that all winning online players multitable. So those $4-11/hour are more like $40-110/hour, if they play an average of 10 tables. Which again is pretty realistic for the top players.I took a look at a few of the top MTT players and their averages are about $20-55 per game. Let's say a game is 5 hours on average (probably being very conservative), which would put their hourly income at $4-11/hour.
Would love to see actual numbers to back this up - how many tournaments are played together at a time with multitasking on average, how many hours are actually spent on average, etc. - to see where the actual hourly rate is. Winning players range from barely winning to the very top, and I was cherry picking literally the top of the top when I looked.The average duration someone spends in an MTT is much less than the time, it lasts. After two hours at least half the field is gone, so even if the tournament lasts for 11 hours (like some of the biggest events), the average time spend by a player is much less than that. And in top of that all winning online players multitable. So those $4-11/hour are more like $40-110/hour, if they play an average of 10 tables. Which again is pretty realistic for the top players.