Full Tilt poker bots pokerjoda and blondini9 active 11 months

[poker d player]

I just searched and neither was playing .... ??

 

[Xyphon]

These are on limit games correct? I guess I will have to watch out for them if I ever play the limit games. Lucky for me i like no-limit. And I am stuck playing freerolls cause of the lack of a bankroll. Guess I am still safe from this ftm.

 

[imasquare]

I wonder how difficult it must be to beat those bots, that would be the ultimate challenge, especially if they play in limit cash games, i would like to play against one to see how good they are.

 

[pantin007]

can we stop calling them bots unless it is confirmed that they are indeed bots
just refer to them by the account name

 

[hipshot55]

This is very sad to hear. Doesn't Full Tilt already make enough money? FT probably has other bots in other games. It's bad enough that you have to pay fifty cents to play in a dollar buy-in but now this.

Whoa! Unless I missed something fairly huge in these posts, I don't think anyone has suggested that Full Tilt is actually running these alleged bots themselves.

Let's not get another ugly "rigging" rumor started here, please. This has, so far, been a reasoned and civilized discussion of a perceived cheating problem.

 

[tubaralhao]

Didnt even know there was such thing as poker bots. Why hasn't fulltilt solved the problem. Really weird stuff going on

 

[Dan Gosse]

can we stop calling them bots unless it is confirmed that they are indeed bots
just refer to them by the account name

I can call a tree a tree but I can't call a bot a bot? There is an much greater chance of a tree being Elmer Fudd in disguise hunting Bugs Bunny than of the pokerjoda pokerbot not being a pokerbot.

 

[pantin007]

I can call a tree but I can't call a bot a bot? There is an much greater chance of a tree being Elmer Fudd in disguise hunting Bugs Bunny than of the pokerjoda pokerbot not being a pokerbot.

the evidence is still not conclusive and ur swaying ppl's opinion by saying that they are bots when there is a chance that they are not
what ur doing can be classified as slander, so stop

 

[Dan Gosse]

the evidence is still not conclusive and ur swaying ppl's opinion by saying that they are bots when there is a chance that they are not
what ur doing can be classified as slander, so stop

Its only about as conclusive as the fact that a Royal Flush beats one pair in Texas Hold'em.

The quoted poster illustrates just why O.J. walked. Wonder no more.

By pantin007's (the James Bond of Pantin, france mind you) insane standards, every jail on the planet would be empty because the evidence would never be conclusive enough to convict anyone.

"Yes, your honor there were 20 witnesses to the robbery the day in the question, 19 of whom have indentified the accused as the thief. But my grandmother (who I admit has been losing her vision in recent years), the 20th witness, is not so sure. So please, lets refrain from slandering the good name of accused by referring to him as a lowly thief."

 

[spranger]

"Your honour...I have found conclusive evidence that this is a Poker bot."
"Where is it?"
"I don't know!"

 

[DonkeySmash]

Never see them playing

I have been reading this for about 4 days now am constantly on Full Tilt. I have yet to see either one at a table and have checked about 30 different times in that 4 day period. Am I totally missing something. I thought the original comment said they play 2 shifts. REALLY! Well than how come they are never playing.

DonkeySmash:joyman:

 

[pantin007]

Its only about as conclusive as the fact that a Royal Flush beats one pair in Texas Hold'em.

The quoted poster illustrates just why O.J. walked. Wonder no more.

By pantin007's (the James Bond of Pantin, France mind you) insane standards, every jail on the planet would be empty because the evidence would never be conclusive enough to convict anyone.

"Yes, your honor there were 20 witnesses to the robbery the day in the question, 19 of whom have indentified the accused as the thief. But my grandmother (who I admit has been losing her vision in recent years), the 20th witness, is not so sure. So please, lets refrain from slandering the good name of accused by referring to him as a lowly thief."

this post is complete and utter crap

u have not posted conclusive evidence, u said that they might be polaris bots but again there is nothing in this thread to support that statement

so what if they play at different times, ppl live in different parts of the world

playing at a stake for a long period of time doesnt mean anything, they could just be practicing very strict brm and are most comfortable there


ppl claimed bot in this thread :http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/29/news-views-gossip/found-ultimate-micro-grinder-lmao-360859/ but it turns out that he wasnt a bot, im not going to jump to a conclusion with the limited evidence given

 

[Dertaderp23]

Ever since this was posted I have been searching for these two points at all different times of the day and have they have not been playing

 

[chelooo]

report it man this shouldn't be happening we have to do something about it!!!

 

[Dan Gosse]

All of the concrete evidence has been posted here previously. No human would be capable of all the consistent exact actions over a few matches let alone 9,661 of them (to be exact).

For people not reading the entire thread, I'll simply restate one piece of evidence:

THE. BOTS. CONTINUE. TO. PLAY. NORMALLY. WHEN. THEIR. OPPONENTS. SIT. OUT.

Re: The bots not playing in the last few days.

AGAIN, as posted previously:

Is the operator(s) having the bots lay low as a result my recent outing of them?

The pokerjoda bot hasn't played a game since 10 FEB 2009 at 02:52 (EST) and blondini9 bot hasn't played a game since 10 FEB 2009 at 16:15 (EST).

Or does the operator just have them take a few days off occasionally to avoid suspicion?

Will keep you updated.

 

[jewboy07]

[] Thread contains evidence that players are bots

 

[Dan Gosse]

Since pantin007's posts are so juvenile, such as completing ignoring information already posted, that he or her should be ignored from this point forward to save everyone's value time.

 

[TiltMonkey999]

wow this is just horrible..i cant believe it

 

[zachvac]

Since my posts are so juvenile, such as completing ignoring information already posted, that I should be ignored from this point forward to save everyone's value time.

FYP

 

[shinedown.45]

Bots are very aggresive. Quite donkish. If you feel like you might be playing against one, then only play premiun hands.

^^^^This^^^^, or adopt the same strategy as the player(bot) your playing against.
At least if you adopt the same strategy at least you are 50/50 against a bot at all times unless the so-called bot has integrated software to be able to see the flop before it hits the table.
Just my 2 cents

 

[pantin007]

Since pantin007's posts are so juvenile, such as completing ignoring information already posted, that he or her should be ignored from this point forward to save everyone's value time.

when u post like this, u lose credibility and im still waiting for concrete evidence

 

[Dan Gosse]

I can't stop the 12 year olds from posting.

 

[Dwilius]

You're not helping your case by insulting people. Pantin is right, you haven't given us anything substantial, just anecdotal evidence. Where are the hand histories of how they play vs sitters....and for an extended time b/c FT doesn't show players are sitting on the main screen it can easily go unnoticed for a little while (not for long HU). I mean, I've gone looking for more verifiable evidence than you have in this thread. How about presenting us with something instead of just repeating that they are confirmed bots by your observations and hearsay.

 

[Jaynore]

Unbelieveable, yet not unrealistic =(

 

[WVHillbilly]

I've read this thread from the beginning and I think it's time for Dan to submit some real evidence or for this thread to be closed. It's just basically slander without ANY SHRED of evidence.