I must've missed this.
Can you explain this system you have for Roulette?
Years ago I played some Roulette on one of the sites. I think it was WilliamHill. (but could've been something else... I played on over 40 different sites at one point). If you wagered $30, they'd give you an entry to a juicy weekly freeroll with a low number of entrants. Myself and a few other CC members would try to play it each week. We'd bet $14 on Red & $14 on Black, & $1 on 00 & $1 on 0
With your system, you would still likely lose $2 to get that freeroll ticket but it sounds like it was worth it.
My system was like a degenerate version of a Martindale. Instead of playing the 50/50 bets like odd/even, red/black, I bet on two of the three groups of numbers in rows and/or two of the three groups of numbers in columns (divides the board into 12s). Those each pay triple if they hit.
I would bet $1 on two of three twelves. Whenever I won, I would change the twelves up so as not to include the twelves where the last winning number was. If I lost, I just kept my selections and doubled my bets ($1 became $2, $2 became $4, etc.). As soon as I won again, I reset my bets to $1. This worked great at PokerStars to the tune of between $400 and $500 in profit.
Like just about every system in
roulette, it seems to work great until it doesn't. And eventually, it seems that no matter what you do (other than quiting while ahead), you will run into a scenario where the wheel repeatedly comes up with numbers that will bust you and your system. With mine, the wheel would have the ball land over and over in the one group of twelves that I did not pick. With simple red/black betting, the ball would land 12 times on red. Live or simulated, the game gets you in the end one way or another.