I would just like to know what she would've done if Doyle Brunson, Phil Ivey, etc. joined the same tourney? I think the only reason she played the way she did was because it was a bunch of freeroll players.
And nobody put anything into this tournament directly, but they did put money into her pocket with rake from the site. So if Ultimatebet and herself want to promote this tournament, I think there should be a higher standard. But they obviously got what they wanted out of it (i.e. a bunch of people to download the app onto their phones so that Ultimatebet could continue to pull even more rake) so I guess that was enough for them.
Even if it was just a bunch of freeroll players, which it was a FREEroll there was probably going to be freeroll players in the freeroll. But if she didn't want to play with freeroll players, she just wanted to play with other professionals, then make a buy-in game instead of a freeroll where
freerolls players are going to be. Why couldn't she of done the same idea, but just make it a $10 buy-in or whatever they wanted to do.
I know they didn't, and I'm fine with the idea I just think that she could have played better than she did in her tournament.
Wait. So its a FR with a $25 bounty that would be close to 1st place prize.
So if Annie does play well and she wins ANYTHING or doesnt get knocked out and wins it all. You would again, be screaming for her head.
She didnt want to cash and wanted someone to get her bounty. Pretty cool IMO.
The bounty on Annie Duke's head is one-tenth of the prize pool.
I'm sure everyone was going after her...
Yeah that's pretty cool, but I think she could have played better. Again, if you don't want to play like a good player, then don't host a tournament. That's why people play poker, it's a CHALLENGE, people don't want it to be easy. And if she decided to play good then I think others would have enjoyed the game more than they did.