F
FreshmanJoe
Enthusiast
Silver Level
Why do we have rake in online poker when we're not occupying a seat in a physical establishment? Why can there be no flat monthly fee like other Apps? Are they ripping us off?
Because having monthly fee , makes all the players pay the same fee, regardless of how much they play, what stakes, etc...
For example nl10 player pays 100 usd monthly fee , which is 10 buy ins for him and nl5000 pays the same fee, which is two big blinds for him.
Why do we have rake in online poker when we're not occupying a seat in a physical establishment? Why can there be no flat monthly fee like other apps? Are they ripping us off?
They charge a rake so they can pay the IT people pay for the hardware they need and on and on. They charge the rake to pay for those things along with trying to make a profit.
Because the people running the Poker sites are a bunch of degenerate gamblers from the Cayman Islands who went to community college for 3 months to learn how to pirate a poker client from Windows 98 and paste over a skin using MS Paint.Why do we have rake in online poker when we're not occupying a seat in a physical establishment? Why can there be no flat monthly fee like other apps? Are they ripping us off?
Why do we have rake in online poker when we're not occupying a seat in a physical establishment? Why can there be no flat monthly fee like other apps? Are they ripping us off?
This is not the brightest statement. How about why does a bar charge me $5 for a beer when I can go to my local beverage distributor and pay 1.50 per beer?
Anywho, I just looked at my tournament winnings which total about 8000 free and clear. I have actually won 11k, but the 3k went to pokerstars. This of course pays for servers, electricity, advertising, and the salaries of the reps that deal with customer service when i have issues. What would be really frustrating is wining $5000, but paying a rake of $5000, so profiting nothing. This is where the phrase "beating the rake" comes from.
Beating the rake in cash games is tougher. The house gets like 10% of every pot, and if everyone keeps playing and not bringing new money to the table the house eventually gets all the money. I should really learn cash games.
Obviously an online poker site needs to make money to pay for servers, software development, a support team, a security team and so on and so forth. So the question is only, which is the best way to collect that money. A monthly "membership fee" would penalize casual players and create a massive entry barrier to online poker, so that would hardly be a sustainable business model.
This is not the brightest statement. How about why does a bar charge me $5 for a beer when I can go to my local beverage distributor and pay 1.50 per beer?
I don't know how much it costs to run a site like that, but I do know that I use a lot of sites and applications everyday that are alot bigger and charge little to nothing. Even trading in stocks is probably cheaper, and those sites require just as much (if not more) security, infrastructure and resources. But if people are willing to pay more, there is no reason why anybody should charge less.
Sites like YouTube and Netflix get thousands of giga bytes of data uploaded and streamed from their platforms "every minute", something a regular poler site would never need in it's lifetime. And they need A LOT more "IT people" and "hardware", so no, it does not make sense. Even a simple map on your phone is pretty sophisticated application, and I'm sure you pay nothing to use it. Not to mention social media, which is used more than all the poker sites combined.
If online poker was a massive profite machine, then competition would have driven down prices (rake). It is after all a free market, and entry barriers for operators are hardly larger than in other industries. However rather than competing on offering lower rake, sites tend to compete on promotions and reward programs instead. At the end of the day the result is the same, and its up to us as consumers to shop around for the best offers.
Collusion is not just limited to unethical poker players.
Sometimes others collude too... if you catch my drift. And who is gonna catch and stop them? Nobody.
We place quite a bit of faith in entities that we really have little to no knowledge about (internally, from an ethical standpoint), who reside on distant shores, far from the reach of our local legal jurisdictions. Yes, we all appreciate the fact these sites do exist so we can play this game we all love so much... I'm not trying to be a stick in the mud, I'm simply trying to be a voice of reason for those who might never have considered these things.
And this is why, for the past decade, I have been very angrily opining on the US Government's actions of April 15, 2011, commonly known as "Black Friday"... because what that action did is force us from the existing poker sites (one of which was EXTREMELY honest, ethical and moral - namely Poker Stars under Isai Scheinberg) into the arms of other poker sites who now operate in what is called the "gray market" where we have little legal protection should we encounter any upset. And then, even worse, for the next ten years, the US Govt has done NOTHING to remedy the situation except turn their backs on all of us poker players.
Collusion is not just limited to unethical poker players.
Sometimes others collude too... if you catch my drift. And who is gonna catch and stop them? Nobody.
Are are saying, that there is a huge global cartel of providers of online casinos, which have agreed on set prices, and that every single online casino is a part of this cartel? Thats seems a bit far fetched to me, especially considering that the rake structure and rewards are quite different from site to site
Sites like YouTube and Netflix get thousands of giga bytes of data uploaded and streamed from their platforms "every minute", something a regular poler site would never need in it's lifetime. And they need A LOT more "IT people" and "hardware", so no, it does not make sense. Even a simple map on your phone is pretty sophisticated application, and I'm sure you pay nothing to use it. Not to mention social media, which is used more than all the poker sites combined.
What about ADVERTISING costs?
Back in 2007 to 2010, I can't even imagine how much the sites were spending on advertising... just on TV commercials alone!
What about customer support? (although obviously they spend MUCH less on it these days then say 10yrs. ago.. and pales in comparison to how much would be spent on advertising)