Thewebmaster
Freeroll #2 Winner
Silver Level
Hi all,
I've not heard of this group until today, my wife found this site with this following info :
iMEGA vs. Congress: Is online gambling on its way back?
J. Holden : August 12th 2007
All eyes are on iMEGA, the trade organization that is currently the top challenger to the online gambling ban. It is true that many are going up against the law, but politicians who want the law repealed might have to wait for months until something happens. iMEGA wants to get the court to declare the UIGEA unconstitutional and unenforceable. Furthermore, they claim that he act violates the First Amendment’s rights to freedom of speech and commercial association as well as the Tenth Amendment’s protections of states’ rights to regulate online gambling.
The organization's actions are getting everyone's hopes extremely high, and donations are streaming in as they are requesting money in order to pay for court fees. Many feel that this is the last real chance at overturning the bill, and fear that if iMEGA loses the case, the big name online poker sites still catering to US players will be forced to shut down, at least to the US market.
I found the official iMEGA site and their last entry is this dated 31st July :
Update: iMEGA Files Brief, Seeks TRO Hearing
iMEGA's legal team, as part of our strategy for aggressively pursuing our challenge of the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act (UIGEA), today filed a brief in US Circuit Court in the US 3rd District (New Jersey), supporting our request for a temporary restraining order against the enforcement of the Act, in advance of a full court challenge on the Act's constitutionality.
"We've laid out our argument on the merits of granting a TRO for the enforcement of UIGEA for the Court," said Joe Brennan Jr., iMEGA's founder. "From iMEGA's standpoint, we did not want the defendants (US Dept. of Justice, Federal Trade Commission and the Federal Reserve) to use the allowed 60 days in their summonses in order to stall and give themselves more time to promulgate the regulations for UIGEA."
I could be just ignorant but this is the first real thing i've seen lately that someone is actually doing something about this. Let's hope we get what we want, was a crazy idea in the first place.
Tony
I've not heard of this group until today, my wife found this site with this following info :
iMEGA vs. Congress: Is online gambling on its way back?
J. Holden : August 12th 2007
All eyes are on iMEGA, the trade organization that is currently the top challenger to the online gambling ban. It is true that many are going up against the law, but politicians who want the law repealed might have to wait for months until something happens. iMEGA wants to get the court to declare the UIGEA unconstitutional and unenforceable. Furthermore, they claim that he act violates the First Amendment’s rights to freedom of speech and commercial association as well as the Tenth Amendment’s protections of states’ rights to regulate online gambling.
The organization's actions are getting everyone's hopes extremely high, and donations are streaming in as they are requesting money in order to pay for court fees. Many feel that this is the last real chance at overturning the bill, and fear that if iMEGA loses the case, the big name online poker sites still catering to US players will be forced to shut down, at least to the US market.
I found the official iMEGA site and their last entry is this dated 31st July :
Update: iMEGA Files Brief, Seeks TRO Hearing
iMEGA's legal team, as part of our strategy for aggressively pursuing our challenge of the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act (UIGEA), today filed a brief in US Circuit Court in the US 3rd District (New Jersey), supporting our request for a temporary restraining order against the enforcement of the Act, in advance of a full court challenge on the Act's constitutionality.
"We've laid out our argument on the merits of granting a TRO for the enforcement of UIGEA for the Court," said Joe Brennan Jr., iMEGA's founder. "From iMEGA's standpoint, we did not want the defendants (US Dept. of Justice, Federal Trade Commission and the Federal Reserve) to use the allowed 60 days in their summonses in order to stall and give themselves more time to promulgate the regulations for UIGEA."
I could be just ignorant but this is the first real thing i've seen lately that someone is actually doing something about this. Let's hope we get what we want, was a crazy idea in the first place.
Tony