A few on line sites have cheated me out of the pot. I lost to two pair when I had a set and then I lost to one pair when I had two pair. This happened more than a few times. PokerStars was one of the violators.

Originally Posted by Gorblimey

A few on line sites have cheated me out of the pot. I lost to two pair when I had a set and then I lost to one pair when I had two pair. This happened more than a few times. PokerStars was one of the violators.

Did you take screen shots? Otherwise it's hard to believe.

I think a level of skepticism about RNGs etc. is valid but after playing what I presume is now a few million hands, I have yet to see a hand awarded incorrectly. That would just be too on the nose. Every time I leapt to the conclusion I was cheated out of a hand a quick review shows I was mistaken.

It's not something I even question anymore.

Originally Posted by Gorblimey

A few on line sites have cheated me out of the pot. I lost to two pair when I had a set and then I lost to one pair when I had two pair. This happened more than a few times. PokerStars was one of the violators.

You are likely mistaken or playing a form of poker you dont understand. I cant imagine a scenario where you have a set and would lose to two pair unless you overlooked a third card that would have filled the opponent.

You can lose two pair to one pair when you have your lower pair counterfeited because of pairs in the community cards. It looks like opponent had one pair but he gets to use the pair in the community cards as his second pair.

PokerStars has never been wrong in awarding the pot. It has always been human error in the way I read it.

Whenever I say how did I lose that hand I pull up the hand replayer and see exactly how I lost and it becomes clear every time.

Gonna need some proof here please

There are regularly stories like this in the forum. And it always turns out, the poster had misread either the board, their own hand or the opponents hand. Most sites including PokerStars store your hand histories, so its pretty easy to go back and look at the hand and see, what actually went down, if you dont understand, why you lost

Originally Posted by fundiver199

There are regularly stories like this in the forum. And it always turns out, the poster had misread either the board, their own hand or the opponents hand. Most sites including PokerStars store your hand histories, so its pretty easy to go back and look at the hand and see, what actually went down, if you dont understand, why you lost

Fully agree. It must have for sure been hidden combs to see it quickly. I just can imagine effects, if you publicly prove it, say, for PokerStars.

it's hard to judge someone without evidence. do you have a history of the game

Were you playing Omaha by chance? I see this all the time where someone misreads their hands, rushes to judgment or accusations, only to find that no, they weren't actually the best hand. Can you post a hand history?

It's sooooo easy to take a screenshot of this,,,then you have undeniable proof,,, but i know this isn't true,and that's why you havn't posted any,,,you just made a mistake.

We’re you playing a different variant? Short deck maybe..?? It gave me issue the couple times I was forced to play it

I don't have the hand history. The site retains a session history for only two days. It happened weeks ago so I can't prove any thing. But I still swear I know what I saw.

If you think that Pokerstars set up this loss for you, then you are mistaken.

Originally Posted by Gorblimey

I don't have the hand history. The site retains a session history for only two days. It happened weeks ago so I can't prove any thing. But I still swear I know what I saw.

Until proof is shown I call bull.

Freedom of speech should remain the priority so even such threads should exist

Without screenies, I have nothing to offer.