C
ccmonrivah
Rock Star
Silver Level
It’s very annoying and often unsuccessfully overused by weak players. I truly don’t think it’s an effective strategy even if you have a good hand. I always see players shove 100 plus big blinds and collect the blinds and maybe a limp or min bet. Sometimes they show rags or show aces. Why chase all your opponents away when you have aces. I know they don’t always hold but they do hold more often then not. Build a pot if you can instead of shoving them. The players shoving relentlessly and every other hand never last and if they get lucky the first few shoves they always go to the well one too many times. Obviously you will not win every shove, especially when you have a crap hand. These players make the game unenjoyable and have no post flop skill or they would be playing with skill instead of bingo. Unfortunately we are now seeing more of this at higher stakes then just freerolls. I guess these players like wasting money or would rather gamble and get lucky to get some chips then play skillfully. There’s no skill in shoving all in and hoping you get there. Eventually they will get tired of losing and tighten up this strategy.
I agree with everything you say here, nice work.
Putting pressure on opponents is necessary and all-in certainly does that. In a tournament, I really believe that all-in is a poor play. From a value perspective: a) you are likely risking everything for a minimal gain (blinds and antes only) if you are shoving pre-flop; b) in a tournament you need to win big pots to succeed; c) even with AA, all-in is not the best move (so if it isn't the best move with the best 2 card hand, why would it be the best play with any hand).
A note on the optimum amount of your stack to risk: I did some analysis and if you only have an 82% chance to win the hand (AA preflop for example), I believe that your optimum stack risk is about 64%. AA will only win at showdown 5 out of 6 times (as long as you aren't involved in multi-way pots, then you will win fewer). I propose that 5/6 is actually optimistic, as many of the 5 times that AA is best, you would probably not even see a showdown as your opponent would fold before then. Even if we ignore this and assume AA at showdown will win 5 out of 6 times, then a tournament all-in actually means tournament elimination 1 out of 6 times. This is bad news for your tournament. So how would you protect your stack? Of course your opponents are not going to let you do whatever you want to do, but if you are able to manage the pot (your risk) so that you are only committing 64% of your stack for the entire hand, this allows you to lose 1 in 6 times and provides the largest stack at the end of these 6 hands, all else being equal. Obviously as your equity improves your risk can improve. I am not saying to only play high value hands in this way, i am only saying that this is the optimum risk for an 82% hand.