You're complaining about people bumping a thread you bumped initially and then bumped grumping about bumping?
I'm stumped.
Also, I'd take the under if the number was 4 days of play.
OP should register under another name, take the over, and take 2.5 weeks off.
If you are the best player at the table, you still can't statistically beat a whole table full of players who refuse to fold, and this is often the case at low money tables.
Something else to consider if choosing to multi-table sng's... how many tables can you maximize the amount of money you'll be making per hour... ie if you expect to run at ROI+12% on 2 tables... but only +10% on 3... what is the optimal number of tables to be playing at?? (cuz u will have to multi-table the micro sngs if you hope to have a decent win rate...unless you go on an extreme heater for awhile).
I was checking this guy out last night on the SNG (STT) tables. He was on a few of the same tables I played on so I did a player search and found him 12-tabling the $10 sngs. His ROI was +6% and he'd played 1,045 games, total profit ~$425. So I see the same guy again tonight, I check him again and freaky thing... he's now played 1,325 games (that's 280 games in just 24hrs.!!! Does this guy sleep or what???). He was only up another $70 over those 280games. I think this would be an example of a guy who is playing too many tables.... and am guessing he'd be making more money per hour if he'd start playing on fewer tables.
So have you had anymore thoughts of what your plans will be? Suggestion... post alot on Cardschat, read the threads and win some cash in the freerolls (on a few sites). Then hopefully along with more experience you'll have a bigger bankroll to play with. GL on the tables!
When I have had a small BR I can manage to gradually increase it for a few days until the day that I get 5 bad beats or whatever and lose everything I've gained. There are probably days that I would have won big if I didn't stop playing, however I don't reasonably expect to win a bunch of big pots in one day so I stop playing when I'm a modest amount ahead. On the flip side I don't expect several bad beats in one day, yet it happens all the time. Micro tables also have the most donks. If you are the best player at the table, you still can't statistically beat a whole table full of players who refuse to fold, and this is often the case at low money tables. It's quite a dilemma - I wish you good luck in your endeavor.
In my experience, people who refuse to fold suck out much more often than I can afford. I play 6 player tables mostly, but there might be 3 who will play any two cards and not fold (even to an all-in) when they are crushed. My better hand (sometimes much better) does not hold up often enough to be profitable. I can go days without once being the underdog in any all-in situation. Or an entire tournament without once being an underdog, but eventually a bad beat will knock me out or take my money. I figured that this was typical for everyone at low stake tables or free rolls. Have others experienced something different?
Kyle, if my hands held up against players who call me on a more regular basis I would be thrilled. I'm gonna have to start a thread. I need to hear from yourself and others.
There are two possibilities:
1) You haven't played enough hands for luck to regress to the mean.
2) You are getting a normal amount of suckouts on you, but you have so many leaks in the rest of your game that you are still losing, and it feels like it's the rag-fu that's keeping you from winning, but really it's the other leaks.
Everyone, in one way or another, can relate to what you're describing. Kyle's point is that everyone takes the bad beats as well, but that better players win money even when they're taking the same bad beats as everyone else.
I understood what he meant. Its fairly easy to spot a bad player after just a few hands. (players who always call an all-in bet on an inside str8 draw, etc.). What I'm saying is that these players hit their inside straights, or flop trips, or whatever often enough to take all of my money. Not the same player over and over of course, they eventually lose everything, but collectively the table will bad beat me out of anything I've won. It helps me to know that this is not a common experience - I think.
I still finished up seven buy-ins for the day.
quote]
Is that when you called an MP 75bb open-shove w KQs otb? (or was it on Cake?)
Is that when you called an MP 75bb open-shove w KQs otb? (or was it on Cake?)
I've given this a lot of thought. I suffer many more bad beats than I get suckouts. For good reason: I don't get myself into races very often when I'm behind. Someone, maybe it was Kyle, I don't remember, said earlier in this thread that they suffered about 5 all-in bad beats in one day but still came out ahead? How? If it was due to suckouts, that's lucky play, not good play. You could gamble and slow play good hands (not monsters) alot, but you would still be relying on luck to avoid your opponent(s) from catching up. If it was done gradually, it seems like one would have to play for 20 hours to make up the 5 all-ins lost. One other possibility, I suppose is multi-table play. I have to admit, I have no idea how this figures in. Go ahead, tell me I'm absurd, if your ego needs it - I'm sure I will be bemused by the response.